Boards›Player Behavior

Suggestion for Honor Checkpoints

Punctual·11/4/2018, 3:04:41 AM·2 votes·2,224 views

When someone gets a 10 game chat restriction for negativity in chat. What if instead of the 10 game chat restriction, you guys take away the checkpoint. So they have a chance to still receive rewards since we all make mistakes and that 1 game could have been the deciding factor between them getting season rewards and not. This way it still punishes them but gives them a warning as well. Now for the people that don't have a checkpoint, should get a 10 game chat restriction in my opinion. If they are still negative after removing 1 checkpoint, then it should be a 10 game chat restriction. Just my thoughts on the punishment system since many people end up making a mistake and losing rewards even when they weren't toxic all year. Just because of that 1 game, they end up not getting it which I think is unfair. Maybe consider this?

P.S. I didn't get banned, I just thought of it when I was thinking about my checkpoints to honor 3. Feel free to comment and tell me how this won't work, etc. I'm open to discussion.

7 Comments

DuskDaUmbreon11/4/2018, 3:14:59 AM1 votes

Taking away a checkpoint instead of dropping them back down multiple levels is a significant punishment reduction.

I could see this being fine for the rare punishment (such as the first time in 3 years), but otherwise it takes away too much of the actual punishment.

Imperial Pandaa11/4/2018, 6:26:43 PM1 votes

Whenever you suggest an idea, you have to think what is the worse way this can be abused. In this case, people may take advantage and be a bit toxic at the end of a rank season because there is no way to lose their rewards for 1 chat restriction.