Case solved through a ticket.
Ban has been lifted.
Thanks for the support from Riot and moral support from players. The passive aggressive comments towards me were nice too.
Deep Terror Nami4 votesIf you believe the punishment to be in error, you can submit a Support Ticket and make your case for a manual review.
Elite4Runner3 votesHighly doubt that you received a 14 day ban for ONE game.
Deep Terror Nami7 votesA single game of intentional feeding will still trigger a 14 day ban, if detected.
QuickenedBlade5 votes[{quoted}](name=Deep Terror Nami,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=h5neFQ0R,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2017-03-14T11:18:12.340+0000)
A single game of intentional feeding will still trigger a 14 day ban, if detected.
What about these accounts I see with 30-60 games IN A ROW of intent feeding and they don't get banned?
Yet a 4 year account with no ban history gets a ban after 1 game of doing very poor out of thousands.
I never even said the word "feed" or "int" in that game.
It was my fucking promos why would I feed intentionally????
Deep Terror Nami7 votesBecause the system isn't always very good at proving the intent. That doesn't mean someone detected by the system to be a proven intentional feeder for just one game shouldn't be banned.
QuickenedBlade3 votes[{quoted}](name=Deep Terror Nami,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=h5neFQ0R,comment-id=0000000000000000,timestamp=2017-03-14T11:23:28.825+0000)
Because the system isn't always very good at proving the intent. That doesn't mean someone detected by the system to be a proven intentional feeder for just one game shouldn't be banned.
In theory there's no way to prove somebody is intent feeding unless they say they're doing it. My places of death say I'm being dove under my fuckin' tower, though. Oh yeah come here trundle so u can fist me under my tower, the tower will let u kill me because they're made of fucking paper.
The ban itself isn't what irritates me, it's that it's on my history. I play off-meta stuff. Now they're gonna be like "wow u went 5-7 as darius support, u were inting now we perm ban u"
LordGeovanni1 votesthe system should 100% not be handling intentional feeding cases only people should be reviewing that.
Deep Terror Nami2 votesUh, why?
LordGeovanni1 votesbecause trigger words cant find intention and neither can base stats in a game that encourages beating your opponent and then beating them harder when they are behind especially for close ranged classes that are inherently more dangerous spots than any ranged champion.
Warlord Scrap2 votesthis is the problem with feeder buster. I could almost guarantee if you woulda got one kill it wouldnt of detected it. But the community thinking that just feeding not on purpose is worthy of a report so it messes with the systems parameters
QuickenedBlade3 votesthis is the problem with feeder buster. I could almost guarantee if you woulda got one kill it wouldnt of detected it. But the community thinking that just feeding not on purpose is worthy of a report so it messes with the systems parameters
I definitely wasnt playing at my best (like 4AM and tilted), but yeah. If that brand and trundle didnt get away with 6 hp I wouldn't have gotten banned. Such cancer. Not like I'm missing out on anything though, league still going down hill then they ban loyal players.
##What I REALLY DONT FUCKING UNDERSTAND
https://picload.org/image/raparoow/account1.png
#No ban
http://i.imgur.com/ENhqvej.png
#Ban
Warlord Scrap1 votesI wasnt tryna be rude just if you look at the actual feeders wh go 30-60 games they normally have a kill or two under their belt. This systems just screwy and people constantly reporting people for bad games doesnt help.
QuickenedBlade1 votesI wasnt tryna be rude just if you look at the actual feeders wh go 30-60 games they normally have a kill or two under their belt. This systems just screwy and people constantly reporting people for bad games doesnt help.
i know you're not being rude, I was agreeing with you... but...
http://i.imgur.com/u8vr8tw.png
#???????
Supreme Senpai691 votesI think it's time based. She did all those games in a row. I'm guessing your ban happened after your game and maybe it was your last one for the night or something?
Warlord Scrap2 votesThere all flex and you need to be reported for feederbuster to work i believe. If he was in a premade the picture wouldnt pick up ir is that the op or someone else.
QuickenedBlade1 votesThere all flex and you need to be reported for feederbuster to work i believe. If he was in a premade the picture wouldnt pick up ir is that the op or someone else.
I was banned while chatting after the game with the enemy Jhin, which I had the previous game when I was playing Teemo. He played very well both games. I was going to ask him to duo. First thing he says post-game "You got cheesed so hard Darius".
LawUrDepravdHart1 votesWhat about these accounts I see with 30-60 games IN A ROW of intent feeding and they don't get banned? Yet a 4 year account with no ban history gets a ban after 1 game of doing very poor out of thousands. I never even said the word "feed" or "int" in that game.
It was my fucking promos why would I feed intentionally????
I don't know how you can determine that some players have 30-60 games in a row of intentionally feeding. Maybe they're just bad and have bad scorelines?
I cannot comment on whether you were intentionally feeding or not because there is no access to your chat logs, which would give context to this discussion. I invite you to post the chat logs if riot provided them to you for a more informed opinion.
The motivation behind intentional feeding is oftentimes frustration. Frustration at being autofilled, frustration at your teammates for losing their lanes, toxic teammates, etc. Sometimes you just stop caring what happens to your champion and you just walk into the meat grinder over and over knowing very well that you don't stand a chance. Maybe you're not walking directly into a turret, but if you afk push a lane when the map is dark and you're well behind your lane opponent then there is "intent" behind that decision when you know you are going to die.
QuickenedBlade3 votesHighly doubt that you received a 14 day ban for ONE game.
It literally says one game lmfao do u see the pictures I posted??
Elite4Runner4 votesI can read. I just doubt you are being honest about having been reported for this or similar behavior only once.
QuickenedBlade2 votesI can read. I just doubt you are being honest about having been reported for this or similar behavior only once.
look at the fucking match history lmao. The closest thing I have was 1-10 first timing camille on a misclick for support which was like a week ago.
Elite4Runner3 votesI can also see (helps with the reading).
A small glimpse into your match history over the previous 3 days says nothing for your consistent behavior.
To my knowledge there is no statute of limitations on reports and you could have received reports for similar behavior weeks ago. This would still show consistent behavior.
Ultimately, my opinion doesn't matter. As Deep Terror Nami mentioned, if you feel this was done in error, file a support ticket.
However, you posted on the Discussion Boards, .. where people have a tendency of discussing things, .. and I am telling you that there is a rather large hole in the evidence you are providing to support your case.
QuickenedBlade2 votesI can also see (helps with the reading).
A small glimpse into your match history over the previous 3 days says nothing for your consistent behavior.
To my knowledge there is no statute of limitations on reports and you could have received reports for similar behavior weeks ago. This would still show consistent behavior.
Ultimately, my opinion doesn't matter. As Deep Terror Nami mentioned, if you feel this was done in error, file a support ticket.
However, you posted on the Discussion Boards, .. where people have a tendency of discussing things, .. and I am telling you that there is a rather large hole in the evidence you are providing to support your case.
look at the full matchhistory lmao. U have the account name.
Elite4Runner3 votesWhy do I need to search for the evidence to support you? I'm not your lawyer.
All that I said was that I am confident that there is more to the story.
Riot doesn't need to provide you with a detailed list of every occurrence that they are using to determine their restrictions.
They are simply providing you with a recent example of the kind of behavior that triggered a "player-triggered" review. This means that someone reported you during this game, which triggered a review, which lead to the restriction.
Riot has all of the information that they need to justify any restrictions and there is no way that I could possibly intemperate guilt or innocence with the limited information that I would be able to find from your match history alone.
SwainLaneWinGame2 votesJust because people report doesn't mean all reports are valid. There has to be validity behind the reports, and I see no indication of any game from this player that connotates intentionally feeding.
QuickenedBlade1 votes{quoted} They are simply providing you with a recent example of the kind of behavior that triggered a "player-triggered" review. This means that someone reported you during this game, which triggered a review, which lead to the restriction.
There was no review lmao. It was an instant ban. Ofc I'm going to get reported for losing lane, it's fucking League. I send out 3-6 reports on average per game for toxicity. Not like anybody gets banned for saying "open mid" or "autistic jungler" though.
Jorencice1 votesIf you send out 3-6 |reports per game they are probly ignoreing your reports by now.
I also report for TRUE toxicity and i send a report probly once every 50 games.
QuickenedBlade1 votesIf you send out 3-6 |reports per game they are probly ignoreing your reports by now.
I also report for TRUE toxicity and i send a report probly once every 50 games.
No I get notifications atleast once a week that somebody's been banned.
Jorencice1 votesShrug. Throw enough shit at a wall and somethings bound to stick.
Shame on riot for not ignoring u though.
QuickenedBlade1 votesWhy do I need to search for the evidence to support you? I'm not your lawyer.
All that I said was that I am confident that there is more to the story.
Riot doesn't need to provide you with a detailed list of every occurrence that they are using to determine their restrictions.
They are simply providing you with a recent example of the kind of behavior that triggered a "player-triggered" review. This means that someone reported you during this game, which triggered a review, which lead to the restriction.
Riot has all of the information that they need to justify any restrictions and there is no way that I could possibly intemperate guilt or innocence with the limited information that I would be able to find from your match history alone.
Ban lifted. Cya
SwainLaneWinGame1 votesI see nothing wrong with this player's match history. I have my own games of similar or worse negative scoring due to same type of issues (being late, 5am, tired, tilted, outmatched/outclassed, etc). And I play faaaar more off meta than most.
Seems to me like you're just witchhunting.
QuickenedBlade1 votesI can read. I just doubt you are being honest about having been reported for this or similar behavior only once.
Wow my name is "iOnlyPlayOffMeta" hmm I wonder if I've been reported for doing bad.... Maybe the game I went syndra jg and destroyed the enemy graves jungle?
deathgod52 votesOk I see no reason to immediately doubt you. Try to get your hands on the recording and upload the replay here(via youtube). That way you might get this post to the top as a false positive from the feeding system.
Ill upvote it for now in the hope some rioter will see this and give some clarity on the situation.
Felidae771 votesYour average deaths/game is rather high (15, 16, 14, 9, 10, 4, 10, 9, 6, and 7 for your last ten games, for an average of 10 deaths/game), so you've probably got a pattern of being reported for inting. However, playing bad is not punishable, and Riot has, in the past, overturned bans if the player can prove they're not inting. _ Save any replays you have for review,_ particularly of the last few games.
Consider playing more conservatively, though. You tend to contribute a lot of gold to the enemy's coffers.
SwainLaneWinGame1 votesjust because a player has double digit deaths does not automagically make one an "inter".
Felidae771 votesEr... yes, I know. I said that.
That said, he still has an unusually high deaths/game, which, given the general saltiness of league players, means he's likely gotten reported pretty often. He should be able to get it overturned if he can give Riot proof that he's not inting: Having bad games is not a punishable offense.
Still, maybe he should consider playing a bit more conservatively, so that D/game ratio goes down. I'm admittedly no league expert, but it does seem anomalously high, and puts him at risk of continually being reported.
QuickenedBlade1 votesEr... yes, I know. I said that.
That said, he still has an unusually high deaths/game, which, given the general saltiness of league players, means he's likely gotten reported pretty often. He should be able to get it overturned if he can give Riot proof that he's not inting: Having bad games is not a punishable offense.
Still, maybe he should consider playing a bit more conservatively, so that D/game ratio goes down. I'm admittedly no league expert, but it does seem anomalously high, and puts him at risk of continually being reported.
I play for macro. That's why I was Diamond last season and was in my promos to plat 3. My macro is master tier. I will die to get 2 kills. I will die to get baron. I will die to bait the whole enemy team so my team can march into their base. I'll die backdooring both nexus turrets. They add up, but I still win.
Felidae771 votesIMO you're still donating a bit much gold to the enemy team, but that's not really what this thread is about. You have a high-risk high-reward style of play, and that's a legitimate strategy in LoL, though one that could annoy your team-mates and lead to a high incidence of being reported.
Still, I'm glad you got your ban lifted! :-)
QuickenedBlade1 votesIMO you're still donating a bit much gold to the enemy team, but that's not really what this thread is about. You have a high-risk high-reward style of play, and that's a legitimate strategy in LoL, though one that could annoy your team-mates and lead to a high incidence of being reported.
Still, I'm glad you got your ban lifted! :-)
Here's a recent game of solo queue. Down by 15k gold.
https://i.gyazo.com/f8c8e9b8abc360b5fdde90b679875cb6.gif
I was tristana. I was 12-12
Macroplay for win. If I win lane I still lose game because team retarded. If I play for macro, I can still win through nexus going boom.
Magical Player2 votesJust because he says he didn't intent feed , doesn't mean he didn't actually intent feed
A"I am the President of the World" B"No you're now" A"yes I am, I said it therefore it must be true" B"okay......" C"I didn't elect you"
SwainLaneWinGame1 votesI don't know what part of the world you're from, but in this part of the world, people are innocent until proven guilty. Your analogy also doesn't make any sense, fyi.
Unless you have solid proof this player INTENTIONALLY FED, he is innocent until found guilty.
Magical Player2 votesI don't know what part of the world you're from, but in this part of the world, people are innocent until proven guilty. Your analogy also doesn't make any sense, fyi.
Unless you have solid proof this player INTENTIONALLY FED, he is innocent until found guilty.
1/10 sounds like proof of feeding
SwainLaneWinGame1 votesYou're clearly trolling here. I mean, according to your own match history, you have some games on Nautilus / Veigar where you go 0-8, et al. Sounds like proof of feeding to me? You feeder. Maybe you should be punished.
Magical Player2 votesYou're clearly trolling here. I mean, according to your own match history, you have some games on Nautilus / Veigar where you go 0-8, et al. Sounds like proof of feeding to me? You feeder. Maybe you should be punished.
Sure If riot says im feeding im feeding can't really question it after 5 deaths I am feeding in a 20 min game 7 for 30 9 for 40 but that is my personal belief
0GvDeKTNBD1 votesThis guy didnt even int as hard as meteos :)
Kaioko1 votesHave you sent in a support ticket? Based on your match history you punishment isn't justifiable.
QuickenedBlade1 votesHave you sent in a support ticket? Based on your match history you punishment isn't justifiable.
Yup just got it lifted
LawUrDepravdHart1 votesAlso, the fact that you died 15 times in a 23 minute game (1.5 deaths per minute) is probably a good indicator that there was some form of intent in the deaths. If you look at your other games you die 16 times in a 43 minute game, 14 times in a 50 minute game, etc.
Telephone Booth1 votesI know this was a mistake and you got your ban lifted... this is not directed towards you.
People only get a 14 day ban for intentionally feeding?! That shit should be immediate permaban, given that there's a solid case of inting. If they're sure that you intentionally fed, they should ban your account forever. There's no excuse for that shit. Pure troll. Gtfo if you int.
QuickenedBlade1 votes[{quoted}](name=Telephone Booth,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=h5neFQ0R,comment-id=000b,timestamp=2017-03-18T04:10:53.896+0000)
I know this was a mistake and you got your ban lifted... this is not directed towards you.
People only get a 14 day ban for intentionally feeding?! That shit should be immediate permaban, given that there's a solid case of inting. If they're sure that you intentionally fed, they should ban your account forever. There's no excuse for that shit. Pure troll. Gtfo if you int.
My account has had no previous bans (except other perm bans that have been lifted). How would it be fair if I had a bad day and decided to int one game to have a 4 year old account banned permanently for a first offense? Nothing should be straight-to-perm under and circumstance on any game other than for cheating. There is no reason big enough to justify it realistically. I want every int feeder in my games perm'd, but if it's their first time doing it there's no justification to permanently ban for a first offense. It'd be like having your first traffic ticket result in a 12 month loss of license instead of taking a class.
