Tyler1 special treatment.

Extasios·Apr 30, 2016·10 votes·2,761 views

Tyler would never of been banned if he wasn't famous. We call that a preferential treatment.

The guy literally have to hide to be able to play.

EDIT: There are so many players like Tyler1 in SoloQ, but why can they get away with it so easily? The worst they get is a simple ban.

EDIT2: Of course, I am not defending his toxicity, but everyone should get the same treatment whether they are popular or not.

Banning a face just seems too extreme to me, whether he has been/is/was toxic or not.

7 Comments

OleandervineApr 30, 20164 votes

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.247357.1314318074!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_970/amd-youtube-jpg.jpg

Awkward CouchApr 30, 20163 votes

The main difference is, while I agree with you, is that he streamed his toxicity on Twitch making it easy to link all these accounts to one person. Without him actually streaming, it would be nearly impossible to link all these accounts together.

ExtasiosApr 30, 20161 votes

I do agree with you too, but if we do it for him we should do it for everyone too regardless of it being streamed. Don't you think so?

Awkward CouchApr 30, 20162 votes

{quoted}

I do agree with you too, but if we do it for him we should do it for everyone too regardless of it being streamed. Don't you think so?

Sure, it's just going to be almost completely ineffective. With the use of VPN's and botting services, no one will ever be truly banned from LOL.

ExtasiosApr 30, 20161 votes

[{quoted}](name=Awkward Couch,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=gAE93RFu,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2016-04-30T03:11:02.411+0000)

Sure, it's just going to be almost completely ineffective. With the use of VPN's and botting services, no one will ever be truly banned from LOL.

Banning a face just seems too extreme to me, whether he has been/is/was toxic or not.

It's pretty much the same thing than telling the whole world than this guy is WANTED and will be hunted until he's out.

Awkward CouchApr 30, 20161 votes

{quoted}

Banning a face just seems too extreme to me, whether he has been/is/was toxic or not.

It's pretty much the same thing than telling the whole world than this guy is WANTED and will be hunted until he's out.

In most cases I would agree with you, banning a face is a little extreme. However, I think the fact that Tyler has 19 permabanned accounts shows that he doesn't want to reform and is just intent on making the game worse for everyone who plays with him. I think the fact that XJ9 is also supposed to be banned on site is also justified.

TrulyBlandApr 30, 20162 votes

I actually don't agree with that. There's a difference between breaking the rules and breaking the rules so publically that people start using the rule-breaker as a sort of measurement for what kind of shit you can get away with.

If you steal a car, you'll simply be punished for stealing a car. If you steal a car, while live-streaming it and with that showing people how to steal a car... that is certainly going to affect the punishment you get.