I got banned for something inaccurate

{quoted} twinito: kids play on saturdays, thats why its full of trollers twinito: enjoy your week ban twinito: kid twinito: tantrum twinito: you guys are bad twinito: why do you guys play twinito: the moment when kids come, feed, and leave the game twinito: yall are so reported

If you had previously had a 14-day ban, calling other players kids, bad, trolls, and taunting them with reports or bans is behavior that can get you permanently banned. This is definitely rude and unsportsmanlike behavior, and their behavior towards you, while awful, does not mean you get a special exception when it comes to your own behavior.

Not really. I even remember, minute 10:40 he says that he will go run it mid just because I asked him "0/3 ekko?". Then he goes down the lane and suicides.

{quoted}

Shouldn't be banned. Chat restrictions should be handed out just like the old days. I don't know why Riot is just banning now for chats when there are bigger issues such as cheaters, trolls, and intentional feeders. This game is just in it for the money now. We're not players in the eyes of Riot. We're just customers.

Riot tried handing out infinitely stacking chat restrictions and found that the players who wanted to grief via chat but couldn't would just switch to things like int.feeding, gameplay trolling and other subtle and non chat related ways to abuse and harass other players. Rest assured though that Riot doesn't promote trolls, but it just takes longer to track them down and prove intent compared to simple chat-related offenses. Gameplay related offenses when proven to be on purpose are assigned a 2-week ban as the first punishment. In case you don't believe me on this point here are two examples of gameplay trolls being banned. Yes it's just two examples, but it proves that they do get punished.

That said though, people who consistently rage at and flame others in the chat are also a problem, hence why they are also dealt with and eventually permabanned should they refuse to improve their behavior even after being given multiple chances to do so. Also, of course Riot wants money-they are a business after all, but having problem players roam around actually drives players away. This is why even if someone spends a ton of money they get booted from the game if they refuse to stop causing negative experiences for other players/customers. To quote Kei143:

When Riot permabans someone, their philosophy is "the chances of this guy reforming isn't a whole lot, we'd rather not have him in the game". Thus in their eyes, they have already written off the toxic player as a paying client.

From a business standpoint, do they want to remove the toxic guy who has spent $500 but is causing a negative environment for 4-9 other players in every game? Those non-toxics are also spending $500 and probably will spend more, promote the game more when they are enjoying the game AND they won't cause a negative environment.

I personally think it is a fine argument to protect the ones that are paying money and aren't toxic rather than protecting the ones that may pay the same amount but are toxic.