Another "gem" for what I got chat restriction

OneTrickZilian··2 votes·596 views

So midlaner who went to gank our bot lane died in the mid way became outrageous that we didn't protect him ?!?! He started cursing me (support) for not putting wards therefore he died. Well, it wasn't just flaming and cursing me. In fact he was extremely toxic and was cursing me and my family for the rest of the game in disgusting words. You hardly can find more toxic player than him. He also promised to report me for the text below.

There it is, Ladies and Gentleman, have a good reading.

Game 1 sc2salt: jhin, do you know how to use zilean ulti ? sc2salt: i mean sc2salt: ezreal sc2salt: many "not first time" running away with my ulti sc2salt: that's why i am asking sc2salt: also , focus soraka sc2salt: soraka started with spellthief sc2salt: so she must be agro sc2salt: soraka, how much money ? sc2salt: soraka, how much ? i want to know whaty is better, your or my item sc2salt: i had 1200 by the time sc2salt: so the same sc2salt: sorry sc2salt: we can trade sc2salt: u had my ulti sc2salt: dind't intend to die for you sc2salt: your fault, you run away with my ulti sc2salt: you run away sc2salt: you l2p sc2salt: sorry, was talking to ezreal, didnt see sc2salt: it's my fault dude, I appologise sc2salt: i need shop sc2salt: me ? sc2salt: fk you sc2salt: i died for you, ill report you sc2salt: dumb maza comes to die then blames me sc2salt: yeah, ill mute you myself sc2salt: bye sc2salt: ok, no more help sc2salt: died twice on idiotic pings sc2salt: I hope you will get 14 days ban for your flame, it will be your x-mas present sc2salt: plz go afk sc2salt: cuz more you talking more obvious ban you will get, do yourself a favour sc2salt: :D sc2salt: keep talking sc2salt: you losing this game sc2salt: I am so happy for your ban sc2salt: toxic as hell sc2salt: you will see, dont worry sc2salt: what ? sc2salt: tell me more about my family please sc2salt: cuz i got charmed sc2salt: hey malza, what's up ? sc2salt: u like me and my family, dont you ? sc2salt: dont worry, you get bann, so you can keep quiet now or keep talkint doesnt matter any more sc2salt: we lose cuz of malzahar flame

ps. Apparently it was me and not him who got punished. The moral of the situation - either mute from start or don't expect reasonableness from RIOT moderators.

18 Comments

Jo0o7 votes

The real moral of the story: Don't engage in hostile pissing matches with idiots. Nobody ever wins.

Seriously, your mid got pissed, but that warrants maybe 0-1 responses from you. Not an entire conversation, in which you tell him "fuck you", ask him to AFK (presumably because you think he's useless), wish bannings upon him, and repeatedly engage him. Nothing you said helped (Indeed, at the end you blame the loss on him flaming, which wouldn't make any sense if you hadn't argued in the first place). He certainly doesn't seem innocent here, but neither do you.

And also, the meta very much favors mid laners ganking bot lane for early tower pressure and double kills. While not something to flame over, it's troubling that you never seem to actually buy sightstone. If I were the Malzahar, I'd be pissed about lack of ward coverage, too.

OneTrickZilian1 votes

{quoted}

The real moral of the story: Don't engage in hostile pissing matches with idiots. Nobody ever wins.

Seriously, your mid got pissed, but that warrants maybe 0-1 responses from you. Not an entire conversation, in which you tell him "fuck you", ask him to AFK (presumably because you think he's useless), wish bannings upon him, and repeatedly engage him. Nothing you said helped (Indeed, at the end you blame the loss on him flaming, which wouldn't make any sense if you hadn't argued in the first place). He certainly doesn't seem innocent here, but neither do you.

And also, the meta very much favors mid laners ganking bot lane for early tower pressure and double kills. While not something to flame over, it's troubling that you never seem to actually buy sightstone. If I were the Malzahar, I'd be pissed about lack of ward coverage, too.

+1 I agree what you said. Though when somebody is flaming not just you but your whole family, you know, that's a different matter. Beside, I didn't flame him, i was only sarcastic, yet that wasn't enough to prevent NAZI moderators.

Magical Player2 votes

{quoted}

+1 I agree what you said. Though when somebody is flaming not just you but your whole family, you know, that's a different matter. Beside, I didn't flame him, i was only sarcastic, yet that wasn't enough to prevent NAZI moderators.

Umm post other logs Also mods don't manage the punishment the bot does

Side note You can type in sarcasm...... So you were not being sarcastic at all. In addition "sc2salt: fk you sc2salt: i died for you, ill report you sc2salt: dumb maza comes to die then blames me sc2salt: yeah, ill mute you myself sc2salt: bye sc2salt: ok, no more help sc2salt: died twice on idiotic pings sc2salt: I hope you will get 14 days ban for your flame, it will be your x-mas present sc2salt: plz go afk sc2salt: cuz more you talking more obvious ban you will get, do yourself a favour sc2salt: :D sc2salt: keep talking sc2salt: you losing this game sc2salt: I am so happy for your ban sc2salt: toxic as hell" yeah you clearly we're being sarcastic........(in no way can I read this as sarcastic) don't lie to yourself

But post other logs for further clarifying if you want

LordGeovanni1 votes

most of this is detailing how his team wasnt doing what they were supposed to do. if some one isnt doing what they are supposed to do how is hopeing they get banned toxic that is the height of hypocracy

LordGeovanni1 votes

Or people can not get but hurt about when they are told that what they are doing isn't right.

Kei1432 votes

hmm .. this only has a little bit of passive-aggressiveness in it. So it'll be impossible for this to be the only thing that got you punished.

There is probably a game 2 & 3 which you are hiding. We also don't know the contents of your pre/post game chat.

OneTrickZilian1 votes

That was the 1st game off my 3 games counted as flaming. The other 2 I somewhat agree, even they were somewhat moderate BM. Thought the other two games feeders reported me for telling them them they were scrubs and ELO HELL (which they most obviously were, so technically i told the true).

DrCyanide1 votes

The whole package is to show you recent examples that were out of line. One game on its own rarely gets someone punished.

OneTrickZilian1 votes

{quoted}

The whole package is to show you recent examples that were out of line. One game on its own rarely gets someone punished.

As I said, I agree with other 2 cases, so I don't see the reason to examine them. I am not proud of it. There were 3 games on which I was punished, but this one was the 1st in the line.
Was it a reason open my case based on this game ? Well, debatable, especially when RIOT can read the whole chat and not just only my respond to really sever toxic and disgusting flaming on my family. I wish RIOT could give a log for a whole chat to show the toxicity of the guy flamed me and my family.

DrCyanide2 votes

You don't need to see what they did again to see what you were doing was out of line. Part of the beauty of the system they have is that it's completely impartial, judging you the exact same way as it judges me and that other guy. In effect, you're not judged by how much better than him you were, but how much worse than me (and everyone else who has ever played) you were.

You could have handled it better, but by the sound of things you've at least been trying to improve your behavior from the way you acted in the other games, so you're on the right path.

I suspect this game was first because it was the most recent, not because of any prioritization of worst log.

OneTrickZilian1 votes

There is no beauty in it. Any justice system before punishing looks to circumstances. Taking things out of context without looking to reasons and circumstances is a partiality. Non of the respectful justice system works that way.

Limmie2 votes

The thing is, there's no context that justifies being toxic. The proper response is always muting, not flaming back.

You were right on point in your last paragraph, mute from the start a avoid the hassle altogether.

Magical Player1 votes

{quoted}

There is no beauty in it. Any justice system before punishing looks to circumstances. Taking things out of context without looking to reasons and circumstances is a partiality. Non of the respectful justice system works that way.

Have you ever been to court.... Every justice system works this way. You try to make your case as appealing to judge/jury as you can without saying you were the problem. Its all about misdirection Circumstance, i was walking home one day and boom dead lady Clearly I didnt do it, cause I was walking home.... Failed to mention you stabbed her 64 times to death.... he didn't lie, merely avoided telling the event that send him away.

So yes the system is impartial as it compares you to the rest of the community, you failed standards. Punished

BlueBilberry1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Magical Player,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=5TefiWgE,comment-id=0001000000000000000000000001,timestamp=2017-01-07T19:11:14.844+0000)

Have you ever been to court.... Every justice system works this way. You try to make your case as appealing to judge/jury as you can without saying you were the problem. Its all about misdirection Circumstance, i was walking home one day and boom dead lady Clearly I didnt do it, cause I was walking home.... Failed to mention you stabbed her 64 times to death.... he didn't lie, merely avoided telling the event that send him away.

So yes the system is impartial as it compares you to the rest of the community, you failed standards. Punished

I'm guessing that you are implying that this is a quasi-criminal situation, as opposed to a civil situation. (Civil cases do look at the circumstances.) Now if you are comparing this case to a criminal situation, then I would submit that perhaps you didn't stick around past the guilty verdict on that case you were sitting in on. After a verdict is passed in a criminal case, the circumstances, mitigating and otherwise, are considered in the sentencing portion.

DrCyanide1 votes

The circumstances were looked at before you even started the game.

In legal systems there's a concept about responding appropriately to the situation. Use excessive force is one example. Now, what do you think would be the court ruling if you started punching some guy back when you had the ability to make it so he couldn't punch you at all? Same as league's response, you'd be punished too, because it'd be excessive.

Kei1432 votes

this system punishes based on serverity x consistency. which means super toxic in a few games or mild toxicity over tonnes of games. Most the time people are punished for some moderate + mild games together. This was an example of a mild game, which so happened to be the game that tips you over the threshold.

If they had a "punishment scale" you would have been sitting on the "1 more bad game and you'd be punished" mark.

Also understand that you aren't just punished for 3 games. The reform card shows 1-3 recent games of unacceptable behavior as example only, it doesn't mean that you aren't validly reported in more than those 3 games.

BlueBilberry1 votes

Perhaps, the mistake was not putting this in chat: "muting Malz because he is tilting me", proceeding to mute him, and then getting on with playing the game (as opposed to putting down all that stuff in chat, which allowed others plus Malz to report you).

More from Player Behavior

More by OneTrickZilian