I have say it and i would say it again a toxic player is better than a troll

BBW Chaser··3 votes·941 views

And riot need to realize that

I am not saying that being toxic is good but when it come to what is more serious

WELL THE ONE CAN BE DEALT WITH A MOUSE CLICK THE OTHER AFTER YOU WAIT 15-20 MINUTES SO YOU CAN FF AND MOVE ON

GUESS WHO IS WHAT.........

So HOW ABOUT fix a system that catch trolls? and stop creating systems that catch toxic behavior? we already have that its done DO SOMETHING ABOUT TROLLS NOW

Ok thanks!

13 Comments

archerno15 votes

Yes. And murderer is worse than a thief. Doesnt mean both shouldnt be punished

BBW Chaser1 votes

{quoted}

Yes. And murderer is worse than a thief. Doesnt mean both shouldnt be punished

like you say BOTH should be punished

Right now the thief gets punished while the murder always get away and riot always justify it!!

archerno12 votes

[{quoted}](name=BBW Chaser,realm=EUNE,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=2yRhsIgo,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2018-04-09T15:26:35.266+0000)

like you say BOTH should be punished

Right now the thief gets punished while the murder always get away and riot always justify it!!

Nah, both are punished

Bijeesny1 votes

{quoted}

Nah, both are punished

But how long does it take them in order to ban a troll? last time i saw some1 getting banned was that sion ornn mid guy who got 511 reports in one month, according to Tantram, just to get 14-day banned Soooo I just need to get 10-15 reports per day in order to get banned? And not even perma? OmegaLUL

archerno11 votes

{quoted}

But how long does it take them in order to ban a troll? last time i saw some1 getting banned was that sion ornn mid guy who got 511 reports in one month, according to Tantram, just to get 14-day banned Soooo I just need to get 10-15 reports per day in order to get banned? And not even perma? OmegaLUL

You know very well that people are rarely responsible with reporting. That any time someone has negative score you have people yelling for reports. How do you make difference between real troll and someone having a bad game?

Take a look at this thread:

https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/kIhXVobd-14-day-intentional-feeding-ban-with-112-score?comment=000300000001

Guy got banned under category of "intentional feeding" because it includes "assisting enemy team" too. He ended 1/1/2. Yet you can obviously see that he was griefing when u check his performance(1k damage to enemy champs in 30 mins) and his participation. He tried to troll subtly, yet he got caught. Dont say they dont get caught. They do. A lot. They just rarely complain on forums so you dont see as many threads as for chat toxicity.

Bijeesny1 votes

{quoted}

You know very well that people are rarely responsible with reporting. That any time someone has negative score you have people yelling for reports. How do you make difference between real troll and someone having a bad game?

Take a look at this thread:

https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/player-behavior-moderation/kIhXVobd-14-day-intentional-feeding-ban-with-112-score?comment=000300000001

Guy got banned under category of "intentional feeding" because it includes "assisting enemy team" too. He ended 1/1/2. Yet you can obviously see that he was griefing when u check his performance(1k damage to enemy champs in 30 mins) and his participation. He tried to troll subtly, yet he got caught. Dont say they dont get caught. They do. A lot. They just rarely complain on forums so you dont see as many threads as for chat toxicity.

112 reports (if I'm correct)? So 112 people needed to report him so riot can actually do something.... Sorry to say but shit like this should be red flagged after 50 reports at worst. Say whatever you want, but over and over again riot proved us they are taking trolls too lightly

archerno11 votes

{quoted}

112 reports (if I'm correct)? So 112 people needed to report him so riot can actually do something.... Sorry to say but shit like this should be red flagged after 50 reports at worst. Say whatever you want, but over and over again riot proved us they are taking trolls too lightly

Can you show me source of that 112 reports?

Bijeesny1 votes

{quoted}

Can you show me source of that 112 reports?

Oh shit, sorry I was looking at the URL and I just read '14-day-intentional-feeding-ban-with-112-score', I thought it was 112 negative score which lead to a ban xD My apologies mate :/ I looked into his match history, the post is 2 days old, and the game he got banned for is 7 days old, so from that game to the ban it took 5 days am I correct? That's....not gonna say slow but it's definitely not fast.. This is just my opinion, but I honestly think that a company, with the most popular game on Earth under it's belt, should be more stricter and faster with banning trolls Good for them, but this is just one case where they responded pretty quickly Why weren't they so fast with a case of a guy gathering 511 reports in one month? Why didn't that one 1/21/1 Zed with 6x tears (one guy posted about this case i think a week ago) got banned? Or 1/18/4 ad kassadin (although I'm not sure that's a troll but I would bet he wasn't going into the game with an intention to win) Pretty sure there are more cases like this posted on the Boards, but this one are I remember the best.

archerno11 votes

{quoted}

Oh shit, sorry I was looking at the URL and I just read '14-day-intentional-feeding-ban-with-112-score', I thought it was 112 negative score which lead to a ban xD My apologies mate :/ I looked into his match history, the post is 2 days old, and the game he got banned for is 7 days old, so from that game to the ban it took 5 days am I correct? That's....not gonna say slow but it's definitely not fast.. This is just my opinion, but I honestly think that a company, with the most popular game on Earth under it's belt, should be more stricter and faster with banning trolls Good for them, but this is just one case where they responded pretty quickly Why weren't they so fast with a case of a guy gathering 511 reports in one month? Why didn't that one 1/21/1 Zed with 6x tears (one guy posted about this case i think a week ago) got banned? Or 1/18/4 ad kassadin (although I'm not sure that's a troll but I would bet he wasn't going into the game with an intention to win) Pretty sure there are more cases like this posted on the Boards, but this one are I remember the best.

How can they be faster and stricter. People say that shit but noone gives any solution. Riot cant watch millions of replays.

Bijeesny1 votes

{quoted}

How can they be faster and stricter. People say that shit but noone gives any solution. Riot cant watch millions of replays.

They don't have to watch every replay. They can set some limitations on how many times you can get reported until you get some sort of punishment ( X reports / Y games ), set some punishemnt levels (2 warnings, 14-day, perma).. Of course, set numbers of reports in a way that you won't get abused by premades, but make sure that in 15 games at max you get some sort of punishment. Or they can make Tribunal 2.0... I'm fully aware that shit didn't work but they could tweak it so problems from the previous Tribunal are fixed, start some beta testing (recruit couple thousand of players per server), if that works, roll with it. The company with resources worth billions of dollars could and SHOULD be capable of making it work, be it Tribunal or something else. Riot isn't small indie company baby anymore, safe to say it's about damn time for them to get more serious abut this.

archerno11 votes

{quoted}

They don't have to watch every replay. They can set some limitations on how many times you can get reported until you get some sort of punishment ( X reports / Y games ), set some punishemnt levels (2 warnings, 14-day, perma).. Of course, set numbers of reports in a way that you won't get abused by premades, but make sure that in 15 games at max you get some sort of punishment. Or they can make Tribunal 2.0... I'm fully aware that shit didn't work but they could tweak it so problems from the previous Tribunal are fixed, start some beta testing (recruit couple thousand of players per server), if that works, roll with it. The company with resources worth billions of dollars could and SHOULD be capable of making it work, be it Tribunal or something else. Riot isn't small indie company baby anymore, safe to say it's about damn time for them to get more serious abut this.

They CANNOT ever set any punishment based on NUMBER of reports. People dont use report system properly.

exitforever1 votes

Yes. Agreed. A toxic person can be muted. But a troll wastes 30 min of your time.

BlueThingamajig1 votes

Riot does realize that. Riot agrees with your assessment.

That's why verbal offenses get 10-game and 25-game chat restrictions, while trolls and feeders immediately get 14-day suspensions when caught.

Do you remember when Riot gave out ludicrously large chat restrictions? What effectively amounted to permanent chat restrictions? It caused some people, unable to get their frustrations out in chat, to troll, feed, or otherwise grief their team. Riot ended permanent chat restrictions because it caused an increase in trolling. They decided that it was better for someone to partake in chat offenses than gameplay offenses.

Obviously, they want neither. Chat offenses are super easy to detect (in fact, a bot does it). Trolling and feeding, however, has a HUGE noise-to-signal ratio. It makes it harder to detect, and subsequently causes the illusion that Riot doesn't care about trolls.

More from Player Behavior

More by BBW Chaser