okay so proposed solution vectors by op do not create a neutral result, instead they deflect totally away from the meaning.
if you have an issue with the male gender reference in the term, the apropo suggestion would have been something along the lines of o-block or "org asm" block, as opposed to the male centric "co ck" block.
however, you went two steps too far attempting to remove all context in efforts to push an agenda, ultimately resulting in something not in line with stated goals of movement alignment proposed.
your proposals completely change the meaning and intent from " prevention of gratification or reward" to "this is dull".
desexualization is fine and all but not feminism. period end of story.
you also need to grasp that you cannot change meaning this way or you solved nothing. saying work is boring will never be a valid replacement for saying you are frustrated because you worked all week and your paycheck never got printed due to a toner delivery delay.
and that is exactly what you have proposed.
bottom line saying a term or meaning is inappropriate for use in a context is fine, you do not remove the word from use where it applies however.
saying that the word can be modified to be neutral without altering meaning and application is fine, but you failed to do so.
just remember equality of rights can happen multiple ways. the rights of one group can increase, or the rights of another can decrease.
i might also suggest you reflect on something presented as part of multiple theosophies.
in my example i will use a biblical reference paraphrased(as given language, region and topic of choice, this is a better than random chance odds of applying directly, statistically speaking): "anger is the death of good judgement". think about it. meditate on it. consider its' occurence in multiple religions philosophies and axiomatics. then try this again as you seem to be good intentioned in spite of yourself.
lastly and as an addendum, the reference involves a part of male anatomy allowed to be modified without consent of the individual, through circumcision, in this country.
no equivalent modification is allowed for females in this country without consent.
taken in that context reference to a involuntarily mutilated male specific body part might be a little different as well, although this is not the common perception.
or do you want such mutilations without consent permitted equally for females? no?
to paraphrase one of the co-emperors reigning after hadrian " all we hear is opinion, all we see is perception", meaning it takes effort to understand that what is immediately apparent isn't the truth, just the way it strikes us at the time and requires digging deeper to really get at. it also demonstrates that failure to do so is an extremely easy and longstanding human folly, made easier as per my theosophical meditation above.
thank you for your consideration, please have a fair day.