You don't need a leash from 2 people when starting from a small camp.

Thanks for your reply. First of all, Udyr had no plan at all, if he had one he would have explained it instead of telling me that he wouldn't gank my lane if I didn't leash. Players who respond like this, are not strategic. In any other circumstance when I'm not heimer supp, I always tell the adc to go to lane and I stay to leash, but in this case it was not that bad, since the adc has higher dps, just one q and auto attack was enough. Also the abuse warning comes up when more than one person reports you in a single game, in this case udyr and the mid laner. And finally I know that thinking that the game was won because of me is not the truth, but by that I meant that I had a big role in teamfights, and because of my turrets, we were doing dragon and baron at the same time, so calling me useless and a feeder is not right, especially when I went 9/12/13, which is good considering that every lane was losing, and our jungler never ganked bot on purpose. The enemy send 2 extra people bot to take out the turret, since their adc was so zoned out that he couldn't even cs.

{quoted} Just because you only need 1 person on the leash doesn't mean it isn't nice to have more. Also just because you only use one person doesn't mean anyone else does. For all you know, Udyr had a strategy that would have cleared more camps before basing than you normally do. Or perhaps he was planning to invade before backing and wanted higher health (most junglers base after the first half-jungle, if Udyr could clear 3 camps then have enough health to go to the enemy buff and steal his second buff, that would have been a huge advantage).

Also, even if they only need 1 person, the support is a MUCH better choice than the ADC. The ADC should be the one in lane as to not accidentally miss any CS. If the ADC needed to give a stronger leash because of your absence (or felt he needed to), you may have cost him some early pressure in lane.

I understand your play, setting up Heimer turrets in lane before minions arrive is important. You need to look at other perspectives though - it doesn't mean you need to supply a leash but it does mean you shouldn't say your teammates are wrong for asking for one.

Further - the abuse warning comes up after multiple occurrences, not just 1 report. If you got a warning, you've been demonstrating toxic behavior outside of that game too. Not to mention your opponent may have found your comments toxic even if you thought they were only in good fun.

Finally, you should never think that the game was won "because of my...". It's always a team effort. You may have made some good plays here or there, and you likely also made some mistakes here and there, and your teammates likely did the same, and your enemies likely did the same but had more mistakes. For one specific point, just because you succeed at keeping baron/dragon warded doesn't mean you were responsible for your team's dragon/baron control. Keep them warded all you like, if the other team kills your jungler and solo laners they'll take either objective without much resistance from you and the adc.

You dont need 2 people to leash, if you are putting someone behind in lane be leashing then it is not worth it, its the reason the mid laner did not leash and had the nerve to to trash talk another person not leashing. I personally don't even need a leash when i jungle but that is beside the point. I find it funny when a farming jungler says they will not gank that lane because they didn't get a leash like they were planning to gank in the first place. If you explained to him that you had to setup your lane early otherwise it would put you behind and he still complained then you should have muted both the jungler and the mid laner, they have nothing to offer of value at that point. If they refuse to go to lanes that new counter ganks then they cannot get mad if they lose the lane or game as a result.

Oh boy, you sound like s sweetheart. Tell me, how many times have you been banned?