why no sightstone on supports...

Saint Archer·4/20/2015, 5:14:28 AM·2 votes·639 views

i don't understand why i get these stupid people who are like "hurr i dunt leik runin out uv staks so i upgraed duh siteston" like it's been proven that getting a sightstone and scanner is infinitely superior, and if you learn how to ward properly you won't go too long without wards. i feel like we should put a stop to this stupidity right now, i'm sick of seeing stupid people rush warmogs on a bard then be like "hurr sightstone!" like no.... it should be a bannable offense.

8 Comments

IcyPepper4/20/2015, 5:23:17 AM4 votes

Not buying sighstone on supports should be a bannable offense? We should make not buying wards as a laner and jungler a bannable offense as well!

... Why do I hear crickets?

Onegarion4/20/2015, 5:17:03 AM2 votes

Stupid yes, but bannable is to far. Poor play doesn't mean you should ban them.

EvilScotsman19744/20/2015, 5:34:45 AM2 votes

I love going against an enemy bot lane when the support does not buy a sightstone, keep it up i will not educate them in why they do not see our jungle come in for a gank or why we surprise them out of the bush in bot lane.

dont ban them i want to continue winning bot lane and having my adc feel safe and warm and fuzzy knowing he can see in all the bushes around the lane and not have to worry about the ganks as much as we see them coming.

Saint Archer4/20/2015, 7:20:11 AM1 votes

well i thought it was pretty obvious that i was exaggerating about the bannable thing, but apparently, nobody understood it, so i will elaborate. I WAS JOKING. my god people...

phirestarter4/20/2015, 4:53:44 PM1 votes

let me guess.

you're in bronze.

those aren't supports, those are just a-holes playing what they want bottom lane cause they got stuck with last pick.

Saint Archer4/20/2015, 10:43:37 PM1 votes

actually normals and silver. and the bard i was talking about was plat...