Champion Concept: Donald Trump

Rebelhunter01··113 votes·4,890 views

P: Loan of a Million Dollars It was small. At the start of the game, borrow 1 Million gold from the shop keep to spend on anything you want, then declare bankruptcy and keep all of it.

Q: Can't Stump the Trump You just can't. Passive: Any time an enemy champion uses a taunt, joke, or laugh within 2000/3000/4000/5000/6000 units of Trump, he automatically uses Can't Stump the Trump on them. Active: Taunts targeted enemy champion with a unique taunt, causing their character model to tilt 20° for 5/10/15/20/25 seconds. While tilted, enemy champions always make the worst possible decisions.

W: Build a Wall And make the other team pay for it. Creates a wall that spans the length of the map along the river that lasts for 5/6/7/8/9 seconds and drains enemy champions within 500 units of the 5/6/7/8/9 gold per second.

E: Spray Tan Is orange. Is K. Trump sprays on more if his tan, restoring all of his health and making him immune to damage and cc for 1/2/3/4/5 seconds.

R: Make Rito Great Again Rito Pls. Passive: Riot Games' name is changed to Rito Games Active: The map is returned to the state is was at the beginning of season 5/4/3, any champion that was in alpha is returned to its alpha state, Xin Zhao and Yorick are returned to their release states, and Mordekaiser is returned to his post rework state.

84 Comments

MonkeyMadness56 votes

While we are on this topic, here's my proposed design:

champ: Hillary

Q: chain of emails Hillary sends out a chain of emails at her target. Upon striking a enemy, the target will be damaged and leashed. Multiple targets can be leashed simultaneously. When targeting a leashed enemy, this ability becomes "delete".

Q: delete (on enemy leashed with chain of emails) Hillary deletes her email chain, and causes a mountain of paperwork to fall on her target, dealing damage and incapacitating them until such time that they can sort through it all.

W: charitable organization Toggle effect: when activated, Hillary expends mana per second. All enemy champions in her area send her gold per second, which she can spend on anything she wants. However, all allied structures take damage depending on how much gold Hillary collects.

E: Rallying cry Hillary let's out a shrill screech, empowering all female allies in her area. This buff makes all female allies (including Hillary) invulnerable and immune to cc for 5 seconds. It also causes 100% of damage directed at female allies to be reflected. While active, male champions deal 50% less damage and take 50% increased damage (including allied male champs).

R: Drone strike Hillary channels for 5 seconds as she summons a drone. The drone then flies to any enemy tower of her choosing and destroys it, killing all minions and champions in the area (note: allied minions and champs can also be killed by Drone Strike...oops).

Enemy champions killed by Drone Strike receive the "Refugee" debuff. This permanent debuff prevents champions from returning to their base. When killed, targets marked with the Refugee debuff will respawn at a random point in either jungle. Targets marked with this debuff are immune to Hillary's Charitable Organization.

Only Play Darius10 votes

[slayer-pantheon-thumbs]

Political satire is only fun when it goes both ways

ItsOrval27 votes

This would fit her passive more, when someone has documents to lead Hillary's arrest, the champion commits suicide with 3 bullets to the back of their head.

MonkeyMadness14 votes

Ya, but I don't wanna get sh--Hillary is by far the superior candidate, and I find her to be the most honest politician in recent history.

ItsOrval5 votes

Oh shit dude, the CIA is at my house! I made a mistake. Dont do what I did!

Toplane Fencer3 votes

Very recent history :p

Peoples Champ2 votes

As in the past five minutes

Votable Jester1 votes

I doubt that would be true even if you said the last five seconds.

SupportRiven2 votes

{quoted}

While we are on this topic, here's my proposed design:

champ: Hillary

Q: chain of emails Hillary sends out a chain of emails at her target. Upon striking a enemy, the target will be damaged and leashed. Multiple targets can be leashed simultaneously. When targeting a leashed enemy, this ability becomes "delete".

Q: delete (on enemy leashed with chain of emails) Hillary deletes her email chain, and causes a mountain of paperwork to fall on her target, dealing damage and incapacitating them until such time that they can sort through it all.

W: charitable organization Toggle effect: when activated, Hillary expends mana per second. All enemy champions in her area send her gold per second, which she can spend on anything she wants. However, all allied structures take damage depending on how much gold Hillary collects.

E: Rallying cry Hillary let's out a shrill screech, empowering all female allies in her area. This buff makes all female allies (including Hillary) invulnerable and immune to cc for 5 seconds. It also causes 100% of damage directed at female allies to be reflected. While active, male champions deal 50% less damage and take 50% increased damage (including allied male champs).

R: Drone strike Hillary channels for 5 seconds as she summons a drone. The drone then flies to any enemy tower of her choosing and destroys it, killing all minions and champions in the area (note: allied minions and champs can also be killed by Drone Strike...oops).

Enemy champions killed by Drone Strike receive the "Refugee" debuff. This permanent debuff prevents champions from returning to their base. When killed, targets marked with the Refugee debuff will respawn at a random point in either jungle. Targets marked with this debuff are immune to Hillary's Charitable Organization.

more like q she tells a lie for massive damage w she calls someone a raciest e calls someone sexiest r she has a seizer or she calls blm to come beat you up and calls it a peaceful protest

MonkeyMadness4 votes

Not a bad revision:

R: Peaceful Protest, range: global, Hillary summons a mob of protesters on a target area. The protest slowly begins a rampage, and then spreads down the nearest lane. All targets (enemy and allies) caught in the riot are suppressed and take damage until the riot moves past them. Any structures that the riot passes through (allied or enemy) are immediately destroyed. Enemy spells and ranged auto attacks that pass through the riot are absorbed and increase the duration and size of the riot aoe.

I'm far too attached to my other abilities to change them, though.

President Swa1n2 votes

Does her W mean she can literally sit in base at level 1, turn it on and throw the game?

MonkeyMadness4 votes

Yes ofc. This is the Hillary champion concept. She can completely ruin her own team for personal gain. Did you suspect anything different?

President Swa1n4 votes

That.... makes a surprising amount of sense...

dogownerjr1 votes

Love this also!

EvilUnicornLord6 votes

What. The. Actual. Heck.

xXMrPeanutXx6 votes

The most uneducated community on the internet arguing politics. Lol.

maembe5 votes

I think the Donald Trump passive should be something like:

P: Make League Great Again When Donald Trump is chosen in champion select, Lucian, Ekko, Karma and all Yordles are banned.
Female champions receive .78 gold per every 1 gold they would normally accrue.

The first ever passive that applies outside of the game.

TFBaam1 votes

what happens if they choost lucian, ekko, karma, yordles etc and then trump is picked. on same/different teams

maembe5 votes

{quoted}

what happens if they choost lucian, ekko, karma, yordles etc and then trump is picked. on same/different teams

If they're in the game he can use his E, Deport, on them, which removes them from the game and makes them playable in DOTA.

MonkeyMadness2 votes

P: Make League Great Again When Donald Trump is chosen in champion select, Lucian, Ekko, Karma and all Yordles are banned.

Also, Anivia, Jarvan, Taliyah, and Azir walls last for 50% longer.

maembe1 votes

{quoted}

When Donald Trump is chosen in champion select, Lucian, Ekko, Karma and all Yordles are banned.

Also, Anivia, Jarvan, Taliyah, and Azir walls last for 50% longer.

Anivia, Jarvan, Taliyah, Azir, and Karthus can pay for the mana cost of their wall spells with the closest enemy champion's mana.

MonkeyMadness1 votes

Not bad

PalPlays4 votes

I guess it's too late for you to add a community pole....

I just wanted to say that I voted for Trump twice (and everyone else on the internet to crucify me for not respecting other people's decisions).

Sevixys14 votes

Did you watch the debate?

I'm fucking terrified even of the minor chance of winning this 'last president of USA' will have in the upcoming election. Trump is an objective liar and hypocrite and he knows it.

Clinton is not the best but when the options are considered.. She would actually survive the job without a nuclear war.

Cmon, would you realistically give the red button for a man who gets raving mad of some Damn tweets?

Schoenberg1 votes

[deleted]

MonkeyMadness11 votes

You do realize that launching a nuclear strike requires a lot more than a single press of a button, right? It also requires high ranking members of the military (not appointed by the President, at least I believe not) to also condone the strike. As much of a child Trump may be, he can't possibly start a nuclear war on his own. He just can't.

Billy VoHagen4 votes

I just don't understand where everyone gets the "Trump will start world war 3 for sure" meme from. He's an isolationist, and actually wants good relationships with Russia.

Sevixys3 votes

He wants good relationships, yeh. But he is also impulsive and unpredictable.

And his politics would let Russia do anything it wants, for example take over the Baltic countries and Finland.(except Baltic countries belong in Nato. I don't actually think NATO would defend the Baltic if Trump was in rule.)

I'm fucking terrified.

He has made 5(or was it 6) bankruptcies with his father's (and Americans') money. He often leaves his workers' salary unpaid. He evades taxes with expertise.

He is a hypocrite and not able to take care of

  • his employees
  • his business
  • his own mouth (more of a Liar than Clinton will ever be)
  • takes every single tweet as a personal assault

His politics will

  • destroy U.S economy
  • diminish U.S influence globally
  • increase Russia/China influence globally(for the extent of WW3 possibility)
  • divide the country even more
MonkeyMadness3 votes

Some would argue that diminishing US global influence is a generally good thing for everyone. We currently act as a global police force, and a lot of other countries are fed up with it. We also spend TONS of money on our military for this purpose, money that could very easily be used to fix our rampant socioeconomic issues in about a day.

Sevixys2 votes

Well, the world needs a 'global police force' be it USA or UN. Currently, UN I pathetic in that role. I agree that US uses way too much money on military purposes. In my opinion, US should work with NATO - defensively. Granted, US has meddled way too much in the middle east.

The influence I'm talking about is the leadership and respect of other countries. Offensive campaigns are just feeding the fire (Al-Qaida/ISIS).

I do not agree with Clinton's politics. However, she is a way better candidate for the position. (which should be blatant clear for everyone who knows a thing about politics)

MonkeyMadness1 votes

The UN was specifically designed for this purpose, but other countries have, for all intents and purposes, slacked off and kind of left it to the US to be the enforcer. And as for meddling in the Middle East, we destabilized the region in the first place when we up and forced people out of Palestine to make room for Israel, and now we continue to try to force our will and our policies on a region that clearly is either not ready to adopt them or simply doesn't want to.

You also mistake me for a Trump supporter. He's a child. He will be entirely ineffective as a leader. But Hillary is only slightly better overall, in that she is probably just as un-trustworthy and has some policies that will only serve to perpetuate current world issues. If ever there was a time to be a third party candidate, it would be now...

Sevixys1 votes

Oh, take my apologies. I truly viewed you as a trumpist.

My country has 8 political parties from which 3 are currently in government while 5 of them are in the opposition. Of course, scandinavia is a scarcely populated region. From our point of view, U.S doesn't have democracy at all.

MonkeyMadness4 votes

Well we don't, and anyone that says we do (including Hillary) is horrendously misinformed. We have a Republic, which is a form of democracy, but has very definitive differences. However, our bipartisan bullshit has pretty much created a pseudo-oligarchy where a lot of the power lies in the hands of the party complexes themselves instead of the actual elected officials, and people are getting kinda sick of it, as it produces the no-win election scenarios you see before you now.

Sevixys1 votes
  • Republicans
  • Democrats
  • Social Democratic Party (Sanders)
  • Populist party, something akin 'the great 'Murican Party' (Trump)
  • Green Party
MonkeyMadness1 votes

What? Bernie Sanders was aligned with the DNC, and while he DEFINITELY is a socialist, he wasn't part of a separate party. The same is true of Trump, though he definitely appeals to a strange political group.

Either way, the fact is that there are functionally 2 parties, Democrats and Republicans. Candidates not endorsed by these parties don't even get to participate in the debates because they just don't get enough political recognition (I believe the rule is that as long as the candidate has 15% of the votes in polls they can participate). I may be incorrect with this statement, but to the best of my knowledge, a third party candidate has NEVER been elected in the history of US politics.

Sevixys1 votes

The comment didn't represent the current system, more like a prediction of the outcome. Currently, both parties seem to have 'sub-parties' which could easily form their own parties.

Also, Sanders is not particularly a socialist. From what I've looked at his politics, he is a social Democrat akin the Scandinavian system (which isn't quite socialism)

MonkeyMadness1 votes

'sub-parties' which could easily form their own parties.

There is nothing easy about this, and no third party has ever managed to get to the White House. And Bernie is totes a socialist, he wants everything to be free/gov funded. That's pretty much the definition of socialism. And while a lot of people in the US would open up to those ideas in theory, our economy is not set up that way, and more importantly, he provided no plan for how to integrate these fairly radical economic policies.

Sevixys1 votes

Well, he wants everything to be free/government funded that is currently free/government funded in scandinavia. Health care, high education, maternity/paternity leaves, unemployment wages etc. That's called social democrat.

Correct me if he is seeking for an USSR system because that's called socialism and it has quite a different meaning.

MonkeyMadness1 votes

USSR was communism, which is not quite the same. And here in the US, we are a bit predisposed against communism.

President Swa1n2 votes

As much as I despise both candidates, was I the only one that thought Hillary got crushed in the debate?

Great Ozymandius2 votes

It's hard to say. As terrible as these debates seem, both candidates are targeting particular audiences. The NYTimes thought Hillary won handily (no surprise there), but Trump was focusing on rust belt states.

I hated the debates and I hate both candidates. But if the debate winner is whoever gains the largest advantage from the debate, we won't know until we see results we can attribute to the debates. Does Trump end up winning PA? That would suggest he had the 'right' strategy. Even then it's difficult to know that it was the debates and not something else.

President Swa1n1 votes

Yes, I guess in the end, the only 'winner' will be the one who benefits most from these debates. So we'll just have to wait and see.

MonkeyMadness2 votes

The only person that migh be considered the "winner" of that debate is Lester Holt (aka the moderator). However, we have a definite loser: America the world.

AhegaoEpidemic1 votes

{quoted}

Did you watch the debate?

I'm fucking terrified even of the minor chance of winning this 'last president of USA' will have in the upcoming election. Trump is an objective liar and hypocrite and he knows it.

Clinton is not the best but when the options are considered.. She would actually survive the job without a nuclear war.

Cmon, would you realistically give the red button for a man who gets raving mad of some Damn tweets?

implying Hillary wouldnt sell nukes or codes to make a quick buck.

Sevixys1 votes

She is cold and rational. But she would consider the right situation for using them and unlike Trump, predictably.

Fisherman Fízz3 votes

That ultimate sounds kinda fishy

TyrekGoldenspear20 votes

sees name

AYYYYYYYY

Stephen The G1 votes

id pay 3200 rp for this

Schoenberg3 votes

{quoted}

id pay 3200 rp for this

I'd pay my left nut and maybe... Just maybe... My right one.

More from Memes & Games

More by Rebelhunter01