Wait a moment....
*looks up lux's passive
oh
I always just thought she had red buff or ignite or something
Her e could be better, but it's pretty standard so it's fine, her passive makes her unique in that she has to auto between spells for maximum damage. Go away.
Her e could be better, but it's pretty standard so it's fine, her passive makes her unique in that she has to auto between spells for maximum damage. Go away.
For maximum damage, yes, but in all honestly, her Q+E+R is a oneshot.
It's real use outside of laning and trading is to make her ult less powerful unless she's already hit her Q or E.
No, it's use is so she can poke down with less mana cost, giving her sustain in lane since she has high mana costs, it also serves as an easy Thunderlord's proc since it and the auto are considred separate hits, so you only need one spell on them. Furthermore it doesn't make her ult more powerful, that's still just her passive dmg on top of her ult damage, it's not cumulative.
No, it's use is so she can poke down with less mana cost, giving her sustain in lane since she has high mana costs, it also serves as an easy Thunderlord's proc since it and the auto are considred separate hits, so you only need one spell on them. Furthermore it doesn't make her ult more powerful, that's still just her passive dmg on top of her ult damage, it's not cumulative.
That's all in lane, I said outside of lane.
It does make her ult more powerful, because you take more damage when she ults you. If she didn't hit you with another ability first, you take less damage when she ults. Thus her ult is less powerful unless she procs it.
Her ult's power doesn't change, it's just her passive damage happens too. And you edited your post, don't try to act like you didn't.
Her ult's power doesn't change, it's just her passive damage happens too. And you edited your post, don't try to act like you didn't.
That's basically the same thing.
And I have no idea what you mean to say by that, because I'm sure I didn't edit anything. Which post are you even talking about?
It's not the same thing, it's hitting you with two spells instead of one, and you changed your original comment from
"It's real use is to make her ult less powerful unless she's already hit her Q or E."
to
"It's real use outside of laning and trading is to make her ult less powerful unless she's already hit her Q or E."
It's not the same thing, it's hitting you with two spells instead of one, and you changed your original comment from
"It's real use is to make her ult less powerful unless she's already hit her Q or E."
to
"It's real use outside of laning and trading is to make her ult less powerful unless she's already hit her Q or E."
sigh when people don't remember what you wrote and then say you edited it later.
I had that written at the beginning, if you overlooked it the first time, that's your problem.
To be honest, that made me laugh.
Anyway, I finally get what you mean. At first I thought it wouldn't matter, but now I see that if she hit you with 1 ability and ult's, she'd proc Thunderlords, which she wouldn't if it just made her ult stronger. Yeah, you're right, had to explain it out to myself there.
Go away.
That's not how discussions work, or should work.
It's a memes and games post i was kidding around, grow up.
No, it's use is so she can poke down with less mana cost, giving her sustain in lane since she has high mana costs, it also serves as an easy Thunderlord's proc since it and the auto are considred separate hits, so you only need one spell on them. Furthermore it doesn't make her ult more powerful, that's still just her passive dmg on top of her ult damage, it's not cumulative.
Your response to "theMoonlitShadow" doesn't seem like a punchline either.
You weren't making a joke, you're using the Board title as an excuse. I see little goofing and more passive aggression.
? That was a debate, "Go away" was goofing around. Two separate convos. Learn to read a situation instead of acting like you have some weird non existent high ground.