Just mark the "I am not a robot" like all of the people do... Checked - I agree with terms and conditions... Checked - I have read the policy and i understand... Checked - I am 18+...
I like that you added in the last one... I mean... Who hasn't done that one?
welcome to facebook when were you born?
me: 1900
Sorry, not old enough, the page is rated DP, this service is cusomized for 300+ audiences only.
"I've been 22 since I was 7."
But the moment you do these forms one day and realise you no longer are lying... Is so weird...
oh god I know how you feel.
"Only 18+ beyond this page" Lol not like you can stop me! Wait... I'm 19. Huh, neat.
Blitz sent me this and as you can see the "Recaptcha code was incorrect" at the top shows that he can't enter cause he is a Robot :((
How does Annie Bot even log in, for christs sake!
Reminds me of this
Little did Viktor know there was a downside to metal pefection.
"What's the point of perfection if I can't post dank memes to the League forums"

might be having some trouble as well.
He is a cyborg, not a robot.
He has robot parts, thus he is part robot, thats why he's on the fence.
People with prosthetic arms and legs are not considered any less human.
I mean if you're a human you're a human... whether you can be "less human" is opinion based really...
Who says a robot can't be human? The question says "not robot" not "human". You can be 100% human and still robot. Just like you can be 100% male and still female. It's the 21st century for crying out loud.
Wikipedia says this:
Robots resembling humans are called androids. Cyborgs are humans and may not be confused with Robots or Androids.
But if he WANTS to be a robot, he can.
you are comparing apples and oranges...
A person can choose what gender they have, because gender is not a physical object, but rather what someone believes themselves or their soul to be. This is the difference between "gender" and "sex." Robots are objects. And you can't choose to be a robot, just like you can't choose to be a toaster.
I assume you probably don't even get to "choose" your gender at all. All of us are, what we are. I doubt anyone just randomly declares themselves to be transsexual. We don't decide to be NOT transsexual either, do we? This is why you don't get to choose to be a robot in the first place.
The 21st century is hardly an ideal example for freedom of choice. While these are not exactly medival times either, we still have many prohibitions especially concerning the LGBT community (for example same-sex marriage). And this is only regarding the western societies. Freedom of speech is not even close to being a global standart yet, and you are talking about free choice already.
Wow, are you objectifying robots now? Being a robot or not is just as spiritual as your gender. Why the hell couldn't you be a toaster? A girl in my street is a dish washer and don't forget the famous attack helicopter who underwent plastic surgery to make his body fit his true identity.
Am I objectifying robots... well yeah, thats basically part of my argument, isn't it? And you shouldn't just ignore the rest of my argumentation, just because it suits you either.
Also as Robots do not have a spirit, there is nothing spiritual about being a robot. Furthermore having a different gender changes nothing about the fact, that you are still human sharing general human traits. If a human wished to be a fish, he would fail at becoming one (at whatever level), simply because he cannot breathe underwater nor can he grow fins. Also I consider washing dishes a job.. not a spiritual identity.
Okay, if you don't think robots are equal to humans (and you can perfectly be both), I'm done talking to you.
Robots might very well be superior to any human. But still not a human. This has little to do with equality in my opinion.
As humans we define this world with our language. This might be somewhat restricting sometimes, because certain words simply don't exist or do not exist in a certain language. Yet this doesn't mean you get to redefine those meanings.
Now I don't really want to bore you with explenations of structuralism and the linguistic sign, but be aware that many, many scientists already thought about how language and it's meaning works. One of their conclusions was that "difference" makes meaning possible in the first place.
Imagine a world in which no men live. The term " Women " would be identical to "human", since all humans would also be women.
Using the same example on humans/robots, would turn out like this: If humans can be robots and robots can be humans, then it follows that humans are robots and vice versa. One of the words would eventually replace the other, because that is how languages develop (among other things).
But we HAVE two different words "human" and "robot" and this means they cannot be the same. Theoretically this might change at some point. But you alone can't make it happen, because meaning is also bound to conventions. You would have to influence the entire English speaking community to obtain such a change.
Yes, humans and robots are different things. But you also have people that are both.
Thats not an argument, but restating your original opinion. Not sure whom you are trying to convince with something like that. Certainly not me and hopefully not yourself either.
But you were completely missing the point by saying that humans and robots would become the same term. They're not the same. It's not because humans can be robots that all humans would be robots. Just like humans can be women.
He has so many its to the point they arnt just parts though.
They bribe the login yordles to let them in
is close enough to a robot with his time spent with his turrets.