[{quoted}](name=Skeptic Hare,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=zvI25TYj,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2016-03-20T04:03:03.466+0000)
I'm talking about playing them in the bot lane. Sorry if that wasn't made clear. But yes replacing a traditional marksman with one of the above. It is the fact that you try and get as many OP people on your team. No matter where they are played. I see nothing wrong with it. But it isn't "meta" and people lose there minds over it in chat until they see our bot lane stomping and steam rolling the game.
the problem with these teamcomps, is that they often can win lane early, but then they lose midgame, because they cant push their advantage. ive played these off meta comps, and the way it is you still need a marksman on your team to be able to push down turrets against waveclear.
if youre replacing a marksman on bot, then your bot lane comp still needs to make sense. for example of you have a marksman in a solo lane, there is no reason not to go with a double bruiser lane on bot.
however you definitely need either hard gap closers and burst on both champions (like leona/jarvan), or you need someone like blitz who can pull a squishy towards you.
matchup is still important in that situation. for example i still wouldnt run jarvan/leona when there is a lulu, nami, or janna.