All for one trolls and tryhards

Okay so when people choose champs that have an extremely high learning curve I need to ask you... WHAT THE FUCK KIND OF COGNITIVE PROCESSES DOMINATE YOUR SIMPLE MINDS?

You solo que'd for All for One and you choose Azir or Yasuo? Then you call your team members feeders when you know damn well the champ you WANTED to show off with had a high learning curve and two of your team mates dont know how to play with them, one performs decently, one runs around complaining all day, and one is actually doing work and carrying.

So unless you are recording an ALL for ONE fails video, why do you do this? Obviously this extends to solo ques only. Premades are far more democratic about it and wont risk one team mate not being able to play well with an unfamiliar champ. No no lets que with Shen instead because you are godly with him, and you fail to realize people wont build him in an effective manner. Pre-remake Shen... okay makes sense to a degree... but post remake Shen... um how does one win with no damage?

Sure you can be cleaver and all but good tactics can not make up for a poor team comp, and champs with high learning curves or low damage outputs.

One game we had a team of Tahm Kenchs. Some may say this wont work but it can. We would constantly roam in a pack of 4, 2 would swallow the other 2 and gank a lane. Surprise 4 Tahm Kench gank! Shen ults Shen that ults Shen that ults Shen and finally ults Shen. And then what? We got swarmed by voidlings because the other team had the capability to agree to play a champ that has potential because they communicated and got along well in champ select.

Maybe, just maybe if All for One had URF mode CD's there would be more possibilities and this complaint would be invalid but some champs were not made for All for One, and others are too high of a learning curve and while you may be great with them... other players will cost you the game.