Boards›Gameplay

Are all the websites we use wrong?

3TWarrior·3/31/2019, 6:01:19 PM·1 votes·1,639 views

it recently came to my attention that pick rate information for https://www.leagueofgraphs.com goes up to the theoretical 200% , but this is not accurately represented with draft pick involved (which is the format ranked uses) Their pick rate information appears to count champion pick rate / 200 , but keeps the champion pick rate as the counted amount instead of dividing

this inaccurately represents the average pick rate information which should be half of that number

https://lolalytics.com/ranked/worldwide/platinum/plus/home/ or lolalytics appears to use the same formula

that does not make the other websites unaccountable either.

https://champion.gg appears to use the correct pick rate format, but its ban rate information is so heavily skewed that it appears to simply divide the champion's total ban rate percentage by 10 to account for all players, but that does not represent the actual ban rate percentage per match. If yasuo is banned in 50% of matches but only banned by one of the players, that would come to a 5% ban rate by their method

https://na.op.gg/champion/statistics accurately represents the ban data, yet in its tooltip for champion information, it clearly states that it does not use information from regions other than Korea . This is confusing, especially when their numbers are largely different from the averages of other websites that let you compare by region (such as comparing korean data)

Can anyone offer a truly accurate website?

4 Comments

Ahri Baka3/31/2019, 6:20:05 PM1 votes

a Rioter mentioned on Reddit Lolyatics is the most accurate site between them all on all data except the winrate , the site shows win rates for all champions 1.2 % to 2% higher than usual In other words , everything is correct in Lolyatics except the winrate like Ahri shows 53.7% winrate there while actually she has around 52% and around it Kayle win rate there is 56% while in fact it's around 54ish% Rakan 48.9% but he is actually around 47%

it's was easy to notice how 80% of champion in the site got 50%+ win rate while that doesn't make sense since when you have a champion with 51% win rate , a champion must also have 49% win raye

that's for win rates only , pick rate and ban rate and all is the most accurate between all sites

So if you looking for stats , just use Lolaytics and always decrease at least 1.2% of the win rate However , op.gg data isn't bad either but it only provides data from Korea ( which makes sense the most since it's the strongest server )

Daddy Ants3/31/2019, 11:48:06 PM1 votes

As Hikari said if you're looking for anything EXCEPT winrates then Lolalytics is the way to go.

They over inflate the numbers

Vayne - 53% on Lolalytics. Rioter actually said she's 51.4% Ahri - 53% but is actually around 52%

etc

Salron4/1/2019, 12:06:55 AM1 votes

u.gg is currently the best lolalytics used to be the best but around 8 months ago they changed how they compile stats and champs have slightly inflated winrates