People with the first three picks should get banning ability, not the last three.

Hrd2H1t··4 votes·355 views

Currently, in draft mode the last three players on your team are the ones that get to chose bans when it should really be the first three. Players who lock in their champions first are at a natural disadvantage because the enemy team gets to chose counter picks. For example, if the first player to chose their champ chose Taliyah, the enemy team could easily pick a champion like LeBlanc or Zed, who counter Taliyah pretty heavily. However, if a player with the last pick wants to play Taliyah but sees the enemy pick LeBlanc they can pick a champion that counters LeBlanc like Galio. The first picks need to be able to ban their specific counters to be able to survive.

5 Comments

Around999People1 votes

wants all the to ban 1 champ

Chamuel851 votes

But they get to pick champions first... so more likely to get the champion they want.

Miraweave1 votes

{quoted}

But they get to pick champions first... so more likely to get the champion they want.

Picking earlier is almost always worse. It opens you up to getting counterpicked for no good reason, and you can usually get your team to pick up some highly contested pick anyway.

GaleWinUnleashed1 votes

It makes no difference which 3 get the bans; chat can be used to communicate, and reasonable players will take suggestions under advisement. The flaw with the current ban system is that players are not always reasonable; the system itself is fine.

This can be mostly fixed by allowing all 5 members of each team one ban apiece. Everybody gets to ban the champion they dislike facing the most that way.

https://i.imgur.com/1HvNiEO.png?noredirect

Hrd2H1t1 votes

sometimes your team just wont listen to you

More from Gameplay

More by Hrd2H1t