I do not understand your matchmaking strategy at all
I see this over and over and over and over and over and over in all modes. And I cannot get my mind around the logic. For example, just now, my ranked matches were something like 5-6 wins, I was placed bronze the ENTIRE time, and every single match I was in was vs. largely gold comps. Then I settled out at bronze 1. My first non-placement match was in gold vs. gold. I am bronze. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
And don't tell me it's because I play as well as them. I placed bronze. Clearly I am bronze. So I am bronze but I have to fight my way out of it in gold? What the what is this?
And you see it in everything. I can almost predict a loss just based off of how well the last game went. And the bad losses are HUGE BAD. And the wins work the same. Out of five games, on average, in any mode, it absolutely feels like:
2 games guaranteed losses 2 games "neutral" favoring loss 1 game "hard win"
The hard win games are boring and make me mad because I can empathize with the other team. The other games feel pointless. One in five games feels even. THIS IS NOT BALANCE.
What is the point of ranks and MMR if from what I can tell, the only way you balance it is by artificially building teams with greater odds of one outcome or the other? Like, I would rather play 5 fairly even games and make zero progress than have to spend 2-3 matches, about an hour anymore, getting farmed and feeling like the worst player in the world. Clearly I am not.
I guess the real question is how can I get better at dealing with their matchmaking antics? My mindstate is I would rather lose a crappy matchmaking "forced loss" game in 2 minutes than waste 50 trying to win a game stacked heavily against me. I got nothing to prove. If I am bronze, let me be bronze, let me play bronze. I am fine with that.
And FFS can we do something about 1/3 of the champ roster being late-game, and these ranked games taking 12 minutes? ARE YOU SERIOUS WITH THIS DESIGN?