"Baron Vs Inhib" Age Old Debate.

DJPenguu·7/18/2016, 3:52:26 PM·1 votes·531 views

So simple question, if there is a free inhib( as in 3+ members dead with wave pushing to inhib tower and good siege potential) or a free baron( relatively the same scenario) which one do you choose? Have had multiple games with this situation and in one game ill ping baron or inhib then most of the time the team will split and nothing will happen. Im sure if i spam pinged something the team would come but i dont have the confidence in the decision to do so. HELP ME BE MORE CONFIDENT PEOPLE!!

3 Comments

zlumpy7/18/2016, 4:06:45 PM1 votes

Towers and inhibs are pretty much always greater than baron. I mean why get baron when you can just go kill the nexus? So many teams throw a game by trying for baron instead of taking objectives.

Elindiir7/18/2016, 4:11:30 PM1 votes

Why not both? Depending on your team comp, it might be better to let your casters take baron and have those that push towers (Marksmen and Ziggs) go for inhib.

Jbels7/18/2016, 4:15:38 PM1 votes

Depends on the situation. If Baron is literally right next to you, take it, and then use it to take towers/inhibs. In a solo queue situation, go where your team is going. Be a part of the "We're doing this" majority. That way you ensure at least something gets taken.