it's easier to have a bad impact on a game then to have a good impact

Lesbian 4 Vayne·10/16/2018, 3:20:16 PM·5 votes·2,227 views

i remember when you would get 3 kills and then be able to either help other lanes or just push your lead (by yourself) enough so even when your dumbass team didn't know how to play around you, you could still carry.

now the person who goes 0/3 has more impact on how that game is going to turn out than the person who goes 3/0

league is supposed to be a strategy game. the second someone starts doing bad there's almost no way to strategically play with that. you took away the hope of late game, you made towers weak so it's harder to hide under them.realistically, you still have the inting Aatrox who continues to build damage, or the Leblanc who doesn't want to get a zonyas vs Zed .

10 Comments

Madsin2510/16/2018, 3:44:56 PM5 votes

This is basically a paradoxical statement.

You say you have no impact going 3-0, but the person who goes 0-3 has all the impact.

If you are 3-0 than you more than likely got there by making someone 0-3.

So according to you the guy you got 0-3 is going to lose the other team the game...right? So going 3-0 does have basically the same impact.

Hayaishi210/16/2018, 6:13:51 PM3 votes

The game feels like this because the only role that matters is the jungler. Which junglers plays better makes or breaks the game.