ADDRESSING JUNGLE DIVERSITY>

Stonewall made a very solid point in his most recent video discussing the new jungle item. Which is...why NOT KEEP MAGUS While adding Runeglaive?

I'm glad to see that its not just me that questions Riots decision to remove old or different versions of Jungle items from the game

Why NOT just keep it? On that note, why remove Juggernaut in favor for Cinderhulk when you could just keep Juggernaut as well? . Juggernaut had Tenacity and cooldown. Cinderhulk has aoe for clear and % health scaling. In some scenarios going for one might be more advantageous than another. IMO if Riot wants to address jungle diversity they should make slight variations in the different starting jungle items they offer. Like several iterations for AP junglers, Tank junglers, Bruisers, assassins and what have you. One item may be really good on one champion but less effective for another champion.

Not every Champion can make the most out of an item. Pantheon gets everything he needs from warrior. AD armor pen and cd, but another bruiser( like Aatrox for example) doesn't benefit all that much from the armor pen and cd like PAntheon does. Why limit junglers to only THREE jungle items that overly generalize the stats that suppossedly benefit all AD, AP, and Tank champions?

Riot I love you guys but you need to realize you're gonna have the same problem with this item as you had with Magus. This won't make more ap junglers viable, it will just shift to a different niche of junglers. If you want more junglers then keep or add more items for junglers. You don't always have to remove an old item when a new one comes out and we don't only have to have just THREE jungle items no matter what.