I feel as if 2v1ing top lane as a solo+semi-support and zoning the other laner (because mostly melee so poked and zoned easily) is better than a jungler that may or may not have the chance to surprise-gank said lane. Is this not the better option? You would be denying their farm heavily and the other jungler would be even more hard-pressed to do anything if they had anything but dual rune buff.
so if going to pick 
or any other of the 50 junglers. i will take all 4 buffs, solo dragon, then ult mid over and over cuz u have no jungle pressure :)
One of my favorite youtubers did a duo top lane and bot with one mid while the other team had a jungler. In short, the enemy team who had a jungler fell miserably behind as it has been proven a jungler wont gain double xp and gold due to the fact they can control both jungles. A duo top laner will provide much more pressure and a much bigger headache to the enemy than a jungler who has both sides under his control.
