I REALLY gotta stop reading Riot Q&As

I go in there expecting some actual smart dialogue, then I read something like this on mobility creep:

"Roles that need a lot of mobility, like assassins, aren't a huge problem, but roles that already bring a lot to the table, especially mages and ADCs, can be." (Totally explains why Assassins are one of the highest banned roles.)

So Zed, who has everything a mage has (in terms of range and damage, other than a stun), is healthy ... even when adding in one of the best escapes in the game, along with high mobility?
Oh, and let's not forget his near infinite sustain, either. But hey, at least they lowered his attack speed! :D ... (Did anyone ever complain about that before?)

"Even with these it doesn't need to be an ironclad rule that they can't dash, but they do need to pay for it elsewhere in their power budget."

Kalista pays for her mobility ... how? "Kalista needs something to hit to access most of her extra mobility." Oh, right, she needs to be in a fight to use her mobility ... which is the main time you'd need to worry about having good mobility. Makes total sense ... And when asked about her balance ... we got a big, fat change of topic after an answer that didn't actually say anything meaningful. How (not) surprising!

But hey, Kassadin is too strong with his mobility because he already pays a shitload of mana to do so in a constant manner, so he needs to be nerfed. Oh ya, Veigar and his stun needs to be nerfed too. Can't let him be too useful against the super fun mobile champs now, right?!