New Punishment Reward System Goes Into Testing By Lyte: ... / Question I have

FuryofThornsRedo··2 votes·467 views

Below Lyte Portion of their information in partnership with Riot, and some thought concerns I need to have addressed. {New Punishment Reform System Goes Into Testing...)(Correction to my mistake)

[[[Here’s a peek at where we’re headed: •In-client reform cards •Follow-up notifications for players who reported a player who was punished •Upgrades for chat and ranked restrictions •Upgrades to recognize negative gameplay behaviors like intentional feeding •Recognition of honors and rewards for positive behaviors and communication]]]

The above is a portion of the information shared from Riot Lyte Partnership in the blogs of the Punishment System.

My concern is with the following bullet point of information:

**Upgrades to recognize negative gameplay behaviors like intentional feeding **

How will Riot accurately define intentional Feeding? Will intentional feeding include the definition on Both sides of the behavior Intentional Feeding? Is Riot to define intentional feeding? They intentionally feed us our addictions every day, and also intentionally feed us the communication boundaries of League Of Legends Communication Process to Adhere to; similar to the rules of kickball agreed before the game is played, or rules. Will Riot effectively clarify semantically correct definitions of Intentional Feeding?

In specific effectively clarifying effective semantics correctly defining intentional feeding, I am a person which has been proven in communication studies in college as concluding I articulate my communication process abilities verbally with Holistic perspectives, definitions, actions, and behaviors. Holistic refers to the communication process thought of being capable of comprehending the whole picture of communication subjects; maybe at times more so than other people. This was determined to be both a strength and weakness, however, to explain my holistic comprehension would not only take us away from my initial subject discussion main thought about a community I endure to be a member of, but also would entail as maybe breaking a record in the longest explanation of information.


Example: Should I have an average day, where in some games my deaths are maybe averaging around 5. Then when I try to 5v5, some of the immediate chat team information is Qualified as Team Chat Intentional Feeding Team Morale into Negative Attitudes.

I have noticed when the Team Chat has invoked me to respond with comments to stand up for another teammate being Team Chat Bullied Intentionally Fed from The Instigator initiating the Negative Team Attitude, if the length of my response is long I have died in the middle of Team Chatting. However, the length capacity to Team Chat is important should there ever be an intense Verbal Harassment experience for any Riot League of Legends online video game customer.

I have been called more than once a "Troll", and this Encouraging(=Sarcastically speaking) Team Support more than goes beyond throwing my game off. The Term "Troll" is heard as a Team Contaminate defined term usually from those people thinking they own rights to superior game bully down any Level of "Noob": Beginner, Immediate, Advanced Exponentially raised with the bar of: Bronze, Silver, Gold, Diamond, Platinum, Champion Gold Silver Sparkling Multifaceted Professional. No, I have not earned the Privilege to team with anything higher to my knowledge than a Bronze, however, there is a level of "Noob" in us all when we grow from the enduring term defined onto us then; and maybe those professionals are equipped in knowing to not call out "Noob" or "Troll", considering they are more team focused with Sportsmanlike Game Conduct.

There I am in another game where there are some teammates throwing the game with a lack of ability in the qualifying quadrants of game review discussion analysis as inconsistent game play. Some people could qualify intentionally feeding the game from their performance.

There is the never ending intentionally feeding communication process behaviors when intentionally throwing the game to help qualify in the time frame of earning a blindsided defeat from those people intentionally feeding the enemy team because maybe they reacted in Champion Select when they were prohibited from the Champion they wanted, since a fellow teammate selected their Champion.

My honest feedback defining my own personal abilities, which I have shared before pertains to when I play over-aggressive and dive hard too much at the enemy. Not always improper. I have learned I was performing an action only to receive a nonverbal response from a lane mate=teammate at times to see if they learned {if I damage the enemy and they time their attacks, have we been able to earn a kill together, and most times I am concluding too quickly that my teammate learned what was thrown at me in the sequence of their kill onto from the enemy}. Correct, I am not playing Riot League of Legends with any of my brothers or any of their friends, so I better ~ Intentionally Feed Myself Some Intense Patience, if I want to help my team win the game. {{{ To those people thus far I have been an Team Ally or Intense Experience Points for the Enemy Team, my learning habits of some poor video game habits have been identified from the collective of all of you people and human beings, Thank you! }}}


There are other Communication Process Theories of Behaviors I could state here for owning the last word, though to clarify another human being performance in their self-decided lines of alignment in their self-driven performance of adhering to the Riot League of Legends Summoner Code articulates pronounced intense definitions of another subject discussion; based on the Communication Process agilities witnessed inside of Riot League of Legends online video game Realm.

My Bottom-line welcomes feedback in any communication process description of feedback. I am wondering if I am the only person with the concerns with the new punishment system? Discussion is open, always has been, always will be. Hope if there is intense feedback we could try to both listen to each other without demeaning the other human being. From: FuryofThornsRedo

8 Comments

chipndip14 votes

I'm sorry, but following your though process is extremely difficult, based on what you're typing. Like, reading this makes me feel dyslexic.

Read a bit of some Yahoo articles to make sure something wasn't wrong with me. So now that I know I'm fine, what the hell are you saying in a shortened, more refined version of this wall?

FuryofThornsRedo1 votes

I am in a favorable place of truthfully caring and wanting to explain what I have shared. Please define concise for me inside of your comment with the extra opinion added. Help yourself assert more effective to me with a more concise question. Or, maybe specify which of some, or (hoping not the full length) of the concern want of clarification I have been asked from you = CHIPNDIP1.

Honest Feedback to CHIPNDIP1: Your comment alone presented a challenge to me. Thank you for making me take a communication process scope glance around. I know I am typing with zero reply emoted emotions from what was shared.


I could reflect in external communication aspects as you articulated with claiming maybe a level of dyslexic. As far as Dyslexic, I leave the word Dyslexic as Dyslexic is defined. I clarify not with empathy, though near Dyslexic is mentioned above, while also a line in the subject discussion has been drawn with communication boundaries noted as we are both allowed to own. Why? My educational level of learning agilities is not the subject discussion I have presented, though you are allowed to own your opinion. On this planet Earth, there is not one Single Dyslexic Expert allowed to analyze me under their magnification, while any level of a close ownership was once defeated from the only Dyslexic Expert I ever knew in my life, and they are now dead. Line is nicely drawn.


Concisely, clarify for me the information want of clarification from you CHIPNDIP1.

Soraka, place calm and sound, as similar in waiting for every single option to recharge in time, Q-W-E-R + these to recharge too = summoner 7 summoner 13 . All of this to illustrate as of yet, there is zero displacement from my calm stance.

I presented my ideas, and my ideas makes sense in how I presented them. I will try to reread what I typed and shared; however, I already know I am not capable of reading your mind, reading in your minds perspective, or reading with your brains filter ability capacity. Though, I can empathize and try to read what I have shared as if I were to be almost Dyslexic again, while that could take forever, then I would need to know the Lore Mythology growth in time of the League of Legends because the level of analysis would take me away from League of Legends for too long of a time. If this is the strategy to make me stop replying subject discussions then I might need to watch where I am going in along the intellectual communication process as we all exponentially raise the standards together.

From: FuryofThornsRedo

COWmanLord2 votes

What I believe he was trying to say is that the post you have made is written in a very large and complicated manner that is not easily interpreted by the average person. You seem to state things many different times in several different ways using fairly complex language. This leads to the post simply becoming confusing and difficult to understand.

For example what does "external internal social community scope defense mode of communication process alert" or "intentionally feeding communication process behaviors" mean. It honestly sounds like complete gibberish to the average person. The fact of the matter is that people simply do not talk like this in real life.

FuryofThornsRedo1 votes

Thank you for clarifying inside of the feedback you shared in this subject discussion.

Much of what I shared in the level of opinions allowed to be owned assert of jibberish, there is truth there. I try to write or type my own thoughts, and can agree in a sort of sense as to you being with correct claims of jibberish. Also, thank you for making me maybe in a weigh of thoughts, or take my time to Fully Scope or scan the audience before sharing any of my Critical Thinking communication skills. Please, if I could share, I like your sound of jibberish. item 3070 item 3070 item 3070 item 3070 item 3070 item 3070 item 3070 item 3070

Somewhere in my life I learned of a word: Jargon. Maybe could use this at times if wanting to ever upgrade the jibberish. Though I have learned to not always adapt all of my words to every and all social conversations.

Much of my educational intellectual training, learning, professional communication process study of Language could be classified..., {or concisely for accurate efficient organizing of thoughts},... one person is unique, and there is no same level of unique in any other person. <I already know and have learned not to train people to be me = "external internal social community scope defense mode of communication process alert", was referencing this for Critical Thinking for maybe a small group debate, or the brain storming sessions Riot League of Legends could exchange inside of a conversation.

Thank you again! The tears are positive! I might not be in a classroom, but there is a lesson learned in here from me, and with teamwork from the effort shared from you. I took a glance in remembering, not all people have been there while I have been exploring with the skill set from college graduation.

<... intentionally feeding communication process behaviors...> <I reviewed my initial communication subject discussion I posted, and the same one you took the time to reply to. Specifically and concisely, I will not elaborate any further regarding this sentence. I defend the observations of throwing a game too early as the planned in advanced, or preconceived determination to call out Surrender votes at the 15 or 20 minute mark, continues to define another factual specific of ...intentionally feeding communication process behaviors...>

Possession arrows to help with the illustration of intellectual sports while I asked Riot to analyze and semantically define intentional feeding. I hope the clarifications are helpful, However, I am also in tune with the external community and their potential communication process ethics far from the same level of diligent attention empathetically embraced as the level of communication process ethics I own. So, I might have displayed jibberish as an innate skill of showcasing a collection of thoughts about ...intentionally feeding communication process behaviors... because I am grateful to own my brain, which Science confirms, is my brain not owned from any other person; which is the skill I used with jibberish to show where I could hypothesize but incapable of explaining the actions and behaviors concluding from self-decided performance skills transpiring inside of Riot League of Legends Online Video Games.

I hope this helps. Thank you for your time and the intricate attention in replying the concise aspects or points of concern wanting an explanation or for clarification. From: FuryofThornsRedo

FuryofThornsRedo1 votes

Comment Mark in the 25 minute mark area. Sharing a thought to help with any person towards the opinions of the Communication Process.

The Human Being Communication Process, also the Communication Process Mode of Human Beings Capacity to talk, speak, share in conversations has been studied and observed from the beginning of the dinosaurs millennium. When human beings own the capacity to mimick each other in a mode of educational learning is a solid core of evidence defining the ownership of the Communication Process we all communicate in, learn from, and many continue to cope inside of social conversation exchanges. From: FuryofThornsRedo

FuryofThornsRedo1 votes

I have rethought my initial reply! I will not concisely chop up any of my information to help the concrete people while also taking away from the relevant information I know is important for analysis. Please excuse me if this is not the answer you were looking for.

A shortened version of what I shared above will not be altered from unabridged to abridged as with the dictionaries. The difference between those two words in the previous sentence are in a display in the dictionaries illustrations of explanations: either more wordy for more precise clarification, or more concise for the concrete people. I will not make any alterations or renditions to what I have shared.

Why?

{More to the internet defense to the large majority of populations of people, as for my reason to not chop up my information.} With the first reply from me to you, I am in an external internal social community scope defense mode of communication process alert while trying to defend and hold my own stance alone as the person I am, while the internal of my intrapersonal core is cautious about the external environments around me, which goes to trust. With other accounts hacked, or maybe my account almost being hacked the other day, I refuse to alter any of my information to help those people sound as them trying to be sounding like me.

Please clarify your want for clarification. Remaining calm with the sound I maintain within. Educational Mode of Observation

From: FuryofThornsRedo

More from Gameplay

More by FuryofThornsRedo