Skip to content

Pick & Ban Phase Suggestion

Torcida··1 votes·819 views

As we move into the new season, I've wondered if Riot, if ever, has considered increasing the number of bans allowed during the pick and ban phase of the draft to compensate for the sheer number of champions introduced to the game (120+?)

Even going from 3 Bans per team to 4 Bans per team would create another dynamic to the game, especially from an eSports perspective.

** : Disclaimer : ** This post is simply to put forth the idea of having more bans in Draft mode of League of Legends. What is shown below is only a simple musing and is to get a discussion going

Even still, it can be done in a variety of ways. My suggestion would be as follows ( I will be describing bans as Blue or Red side Ban 1, 2, 3, 4, and the picks will be 1 - 10);

  1. Blue Side Bans first Champion
  2. Red Side Bans first Champion
  3. Blue Side Bans second Champion
  4. Red Side Bans second Champion

from here, we allow picks to happen, Blue side getting pick no. 1, Red side getting picks no. 2, & 3, and then Blue Getting pick no. 4. At this point we can continue the banning process

  1. Red Side Bans third Champion
  2. Blue Side Bans third Champion
  3. Red Side Bans fourth Champion
  4. Blue Side Bans fourth Champion

After these second set of bans, it would resume as we normally remember. Blue gets pick no. 5, Red gets picks no. 6, & 7, Blue gets no. 8 & 9, and Red gets no. 10.

The way I see this from an eSports perspective is that this requires far more thought, and has more depth to it. By making only 2 bans per team available before the initial set of picks go out, this means there is a higher priority on some champions some teams or players think are broken or simply very strong in the current meta.

On the other hand, by allowing bans after the first 4 picks, this also forces teams to either pick ambiguously or in turn have other champions that are linchpins for their compositions be banned out if read correctly by the enemy team.

8 Comments

Weathered3 votes

There has already been talk on Reddit from Rioters about 10 bans coming soon.

Torcida1 votes

I am not on reddit often, if at all for LoL. Did they go over the structure of the 10 bans?

Weathered2 votes

No, but they did unofficially confirm that it is in the future plans and will most likely be added relatively soon.

Torcida1 votes

This is good news imo. Thanks for the heads up.

Commit Sudoku1 votes

I really dont want 10 bans to exist there will just be champions perma-banned from the game regardless if they are actually good (IE: Yasuo, Zed, etc.)

Also increasing the banned champions means that new players will need 20 champions in order to play draft pick which is pretty dumb. its even possible to just ban every ADC until draven and urgot are the only things you can choose.

I think 10 bans will make this game far more toxic than it already is.

Torcida1 votes

Those are valid points. But as a counter, with the size of the champion pool increasing, they can allow champions on free week to be played in normal draft, and increase the number of champions in free week substantially.

As for perma-banning, I have no counter arguement to that right now lol

EndlessSorcerer2 votes

If a champion is perma-banned and isn't overpowered, then that generally means that there is something in their kit which is extremely annoying to deal with and should probably be looked into.

Unlocking all 450 IP champions by default and removing them from the free week rotation would be sufficient to allow every account into Draft Pick. Simple solution to a simple problem.

Banning all ADCs would require a coordinated effort between both teams (including the ADC players).

Torcida1 votes

Thank's for articulating my thoughts on this :)

More from Gameplay

More by Torcida