Do you think LoL would be better as a 4 v 4 game (no support role, so everyone gets farm)?

Gary B Enkelis·10/23/2016, 8:54:16 AM·1 votes·628 views

And why or why not?

I'll add a poll just because....

I feel like it's pretty good as a 5v5 game because a roaming support adds excitement when they've gone missing.

A 4v4 game might have less roams because people may stick to their lanes/jungle to maximize farm, but maybe people would be happy?

I don't really know.

12 Comments

FioraWillCarry10/23/2016, 9:05:17 AM1 votes

Meta would have been different and you'd be asking if would be better as a 3v3 game for some similar reason.

astralwit10/23/2016, 9:35:52 AM1 votes

It would be less complex and less interesting.

Shadòw10/23/2016, 11:24:16 AM1 votes

the whole META and balance was developed around SR being 5v5.

BeeCuz10/23/2016, 11:50:54 AM1 votes

There is a 3v3 game mode; the portion of the population that play that mode is indicative of the desire to play it.

I Snipe I10/23/2016, 11:55:34 AM1 votes

I say keep support and remove junglers. That role is toxic. Nobody likes getting ganked. Can't believe it's even a part of a game where they ban people over chat logs. Junglers = way more toxic than the worst chat logs.