adc

AudioDope1·Feb 21, 2020·1 votes·1,969 views

if tanks can drop tactical nukes now bring back 250% crit damage ie. i dont see why not theres already so much damage in the game outside of the marksmen role. it would change literally nothing about the game.

6 Comments

vgamedudeFeb 21, 20202 votes

It's not enough that you people get the highest sustained damage in the game in the easiest form of damage, just auto attacking? That your class is so strong it's the only one in the game that's required every match? That it's so strong it has an entire Lane to itself where only it's viable?

adicto a tiFeb 21, 20203 votes

why don't you try playing adc and be strong by autoattacking people? :)

Hemulen MagiFeb 21, 20201 votes

Some people want more gameplay depth than playing Master Yi, Tryndamere, or marksman every game...

vgamedudeFeb 22, 20201 votes

[{quoted}](name=adicto a ti,realm=EUW,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=WXPEA1h0,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2020-02-21T02:29:01.146+0000)

why don't you try playing adc and be strong by autoattacking people? :)

I do when I play ranked. Which is not at all anymore unless I need to get gold for the skins

Hemulen MagiFeb 21, 20202 votes

I'll humor marksmen's whining when they go a season without being synonymous with an entire role/position (bot) while also being played in every other position.

I can list more than one marksman in every single role without even including AP marksmen: Top: Quinn Vayne Jungle: Graves Kindred Mid: Lucian Corki Support: Senna Ashe Bot: 99.9% marksman 'ADC'

Yet we can't even open up bottom lane to ranged APCs to compete with ranged ADCs without people throwing a tantrum. The situation in bottom lane would be equivalent to if mid was 99.9% AD assassins, no mages, not even AP assassins, just a subset of a single class being mandatory for years. Marksmen complain that just including the AP equivalent of their own role, backline ranged damage output, to bottom lane is unfair to them and Riot quickly caves. Meanwhile top is fine with both AD and AP frontliners sharing the lane and just want the toxic ranged lane bullies, that turn the lane into a one-sided barrage of poke, kicked out but Riot continually ignores them.

vgamedudeFeb 22, 20202 votes

[{quoted}](name=Hemulen Magi,realm=NA,application-id=3ErqAdtq,discussion-id=WXPEA1h0,comment-id=00000001,timestamp=2020-02-21T02:42:28.314+0000)

I'll humor marksmen's whining when they go a season without being synonymous with an entire role/position (bot) while also being played in every other position.

I can list more than one marksman in every single role without even including AP marksmen: Top: Jungle: Mid: Support: Bot: 99.9% marksman 'ADC'

Yet we can't even open up bottom lane to ranged APCs to compete with ranged ADCs without people throwing a tantrum. The situation in bottom lane would be equivalent to if mid was 99.9% AD assassins, no mages, not even AP assassins, just a subset of a single class being mandatory for years. Marksmen complain that just including the AP equivalent of their own role, backline ranged damage output, to bottom lane is unfair to them and Riot quickly caves. Meanwhile top is fine with both AD and AP frontliners sharing the lane and just want the toxic ranged lane bullies, that turn the lane into a one-sided barrage of poke, kicked out but Riot continually ignores them.

Yep. Diversity for thee but not for me is the adc motto.