Why replacing Strengh of the Ages, and not Bond of Stone?

DemoGuide·10/19/2016, 4:32:27 PM·2 votes·299 views

While i agree with it being just bunch of free stats, Bond of Stone just feels unsatisfying to play. I dont remember when i ever considering taking it. Maybe for a few games at the start of the season, but every other time, even when i wanted to main thresh, i was picking Windspeakers because its more interesting.

5 Comments

øHaruø10/19/2016, 4:35:58 PM2 votes

What's bond of stone

Slythion10/19/2016, 4:38:09 PM1 votes

because bond of stone is actually pretty good, especially for some choice supports:

Braum Nautilus TahmKench

xWaters10/19/2016, 7:30:49 PM1 votes

I'd take thunder lords on thresh rather than windspeakers any day.