Nearly every of my games are decided by jungler. He has controll over crabs, ojbectives, pressure on map, and what is the most frustrating thing the ganks.
Doing a gank wont put them behind that much compared to ones who suffered the gank. He goes back to jungles, kill crab/smite something and get back his whole hp up. Thats not right. Ganks should be more punishing.
Junglers don't have enough impact on the game.
A junglers influence in the game is entirely dependent on the laners.
And of course ganking a lane wont put you behind as much as the person who died. Why would it.
If the jungler died instead of the person who was ganked yeah the jungler is behind.
Whats your iq score
Nobody with any sense denies jungle impact. Its basically unanimous across all 4 lanes except for jungle in high elo that jungle is the most impactful
So you want junglers to have less impact on the game...but also want ganks to be more punishing?
Am I missing something?
Currently the jungle depends on the lanes, and what's more, in high elo laner invade the jungle and leave him behind.
