Feedback for dynamic queue

The Pancake··2 votes·736 views

Hey guys I really enjoy the game. I think it's going in a very positive direction and I have only a few minor complaints really not worth mentioning. I have one idea for an improvement.

When I'm in dynamic queue and I queue for two positions, let's say Jungle primary and Support secondary. Obviously I want jungle the most. Well when my match comes up and I'm given jungle as my primary choice that's great. However when someone else queue dodges then I get dumped back into the match making system and another match comes up I get stuck with my secondary position, which honestly doesn't seem very fair. My position was taken from me, not by the game but essentially from another player. I would like it if if the above situation happens I would be back with m,y primary choice, or at least be given a higher priority.

Anyway thanks for taking the time to listen. I am really enjoying the game and can't wait to see Galio!!!

16 Comments

ofart3 votes

your title makes no sense

nothing to do with DQ

The Pancake1 votes

What part makes no sense to you? I'm sure you won't answer since 99% of the community says something that doesn't help then leaves to troll more posts.

Zone of Endless3 votes

Dynamic Q is not the same as new champ select. Dynamic Q is the ability to have premade of 3+ in ranked (except diamond+).

Anyway it's a problem that I'm not sure Riot can really do much to fix without creating higher Q time. I also thought they already make it so you can Q for one role but with higher Q time but I'm probably wrong.

AdeBug3 votes

DQ =/= new champ select

As for the champ select complaint, to actually try to help you, there were some stats about how secondary support would get you support like 90% of the time and they reduced it to 80% (or was it from 80 to 70). So try queuing more than 2 times and you will see that you do get your primary role sometimes... Sometimes :P

ofart2 votes

do your own research... Google's not hard and I gave you the basic information

DQ has nothing to do with picking roles. DQ just refers to how many people you queue up with (I think it's up to 4 now) and the system's adjustments for it to try and compensate for premades.

The Pancake1 votes

dude stop trolling, if you can't figure out what I'm talking about then there is either an issue with your eyes or your brain. unfortunately I can't help you with either. Dynamic queue is what I am talking about. You should understand what dynamic queue is. You should take your own advice and use google. It's feedback and you come in and troll. get lost scrub.

ofart2 votes

{quoted}

dude stop trolling, if you can't figure out what I'm talking about then there is either an issue with your eyes or your brain. unfortunately I can't help you with either. Dynamic queue is what I am talking about. You should understand what dynamic queue is. You should take your own advice and use google. It's feedback and you come in and troll. get lost scrub.

you're the only one trolling and being unreceptive

it's funny that you have no idea what you're talking about yet think I'm the one that's wrong... the more clueless they are, the louder they are

The Pancake1 votes

dude you're an idiot. Dynamic queue is the problem. If I choose Jungle and Support (primary and secondary respectively) as my Dynamic Queue roles and first round up I get Jungle. then someone else dodges and I am dumped back into DQ, then I should be on a higher priority for my primary roll again. This has nothing to do with selecting a champion it had to do with DQ probability after someone dodges the queue. dude, i don't know why you cant understand this.

ofart2 votes

{quoted}

dude you're an idiot. Dynamic queue is the problem. If I choose Jungle and Support (primary and secondary respectively) as my Dynamic Queue roles and first round up I get Jungle. then someone else dodges and I am dumped back into DQ, then I should be on a higher priority for my primary roll again. This has nothing to do with selecting a champion it had to do with DQ probability after someone dodges the queue. dude, i don't know why you cant understand this.

because you're wrong and role selection/priority isn't under the definition of DQ. they could easily have that even if DQ didn't exist

you're also incredibly arrogant, entitled and obnoxious.

The Pancake1 votes

If you look at my OP I was very polite and positive about the game. You came in the the baditude.

ofart2 votes

{quoted}

You came in the the baditude.

?????????

making a correction = bad attitude... interesting

are we really that pampered and sensitive these days?

The Pancake1 votes

"your title makes no sense

nothing to do with DQ"

You came in with an arrogant attitude and not even trying to help. There was no correction you just coming in and saying, "THIS IS WRONG!! I HAVE BAD ATTITUDE! I OFFER NO HELP!"

then you get offended when I push back. You have no idea how narrow minded you are and how you can't even see what you did wrong. Seriously there is something wrong with you.

Maybe a few more years of the public education system will help.

ofart2 votes

{quoted}

"your title makes no sense

nothing to do with DQ"

You came in with an arrogant attitude and not even trying to help. There was no correction you just coming in and saying, "THIS IS WRONG!! I HAVE BAD ATTITUDE! I OFFER NO HELP!"

then you get offended when I push back. You have no idea how narrow minded you are and how you can't even see what you did wrong. Seriously there is something wrong with you.

Maybe a few more years of the public education system will help.

you have issues and don't understand reality as it is. don't put emotional coloring on facts. some things are wrong and some are right. this wasn't a gray area. being told you're using a term wrong and misleading people who clicked the thread title isn't arrogance.

the basic information to help you was provided and instead of being resourceful (the details aren't hard to look up in 2 minutes), you lashed out and expected to be force fed everything. i had no obligation to even help you understand the issue yet I took a minute to correct an error.

strong victim mentality... i'm guessing you're the kind of guy who would sue for coffee being hot.

The Pancake1 votes

yes you're qualified to tell people if they do or do not have issues now lol. You don't want me to add emotional coloring on the facts, when they are indeed facts. I was pleasant and nice at first you were rude and condescending IMMEDIATELY. You want to add your emotions and opinions when it's convenient to you. I find it weird that you say "I'm not obligated blah blah blah" yet you find time to do other things you aren't obligated to do....like your original rude/condescending response and every other response there after. Maybe you should google the word hypocrite. I would tell you what it means but I am not "obligated to do so"

Also, you have no idea what a victim mentality is lol. Look in the mirror and stop being an internet tough guy.

ofart2 votes

{quoted}

yes you're qualified to tell people if they do or do not have issues now lol. You don't want me to add emotional coloring on the facts, when they are indeed facts. I was pleasant and nice at first you were rude and condescending IMMEDIATELY. You want to add your emotions and opinions when it's convenient to you. I find it weird that you say "I'm not obligated blah blah blah" yet you find time to do other things you aren't obligated to do....like your original rude/condescending response and every other response there after. Maybe you should google the word hypocrite. I would tell you what it means but I am not "obligated to do so"

Also, you have no idea what a victim mentality is lol. Look in the mirror and stop being an internet tough guy.

you don't even understand what i write so what's the point? for example, you completely misunderstand the point about not being obligated. the rest is just a silly rant grasping at straws. just because you feel a certain way about something (some grave injustice and rudeness) doesn't mean that it's reality. you choose to interpret things in such a way. i'm not the one calling people idiots and getting angry for being corrected. in fact, i'd thank someone for educating me. people can be so defensive...

The Pancake1 votes

Anytime you make a point I counter it. You brush it off with some vague pseudo-intellectual garbage. I can easily flip back what I say to you, just because you feel a way doesn't make it a reality. You're grasping at straws.

"you're also incredibly arrogant, entitled and obnoxious." There is a totally objective and non insulting comment from you. See what I mean by hypocrite. You should thank me for educating you. But you won't, because you're rude and think you know everything and are beyond reproach.

More from Gameplay

More by The Pancake