Refer to the image.
Top Game: Less kills, less CS, lost faster, was chased out of lane by Diana pretty early.
Bottom Game: Crushed Swain, took a Dragon, took a Barron; staved off the loss for quite a while.
Bottom game earned the A rank, top game earned the S rank; despite being objectively worse in EVERY single category.
[zombie-brand-facepalm]
IS that Vel support? if so get a damn sightstone*[slayer-pantheon-thumbs]*
It's simply based off of our impact on the game, such as turrets taken and such. you lost both games, so neither deserved an S in my opinion.
Only thing i can think of is that your score is nearly the same, while the time difference is 10 minutes apart.
The grading scale isnt just for you, it compares you to other vels in your elo.
Wat about warding?
First game was shorter so that kind of performance at that point is S worthy.
Well, this is what happens when people keep telling these delusional lies that the "grades" have nothing to do with NRG. -.-
whats the ign for this post? Sakuri Ono is an aram only account.
Are both of those mid lane or is one mid and one support? Wards placed? Pinks purchased? Wards destroyed? Lane partners cs? Damage to turrets? Kill distribution, ie did you kill the same person over and over again or were you killing everyone on the enemy team? Kill locations, ie were you roaming for your kills (showing map awareness) or were they just wandering into your lane after you had already been fed? Your gold lead relative to the enemy team? You got more overall gold in the bottom game but maybe the enemy did too so you had less of a relative lead.
Maybe in the top game you lost your lane early and thus helped your team more, thus getting a higher rank?
Vel'Koz support? What is this blasphemy?
