I think there should be a new feature, not personally though.

chicken doodle··5 votes·1,438 views

Okay, so the point of this forum is about for all of those who have issues with playing League of Legends (being not able to continue the game due to several reasons). I've met many people online who had to afk for a long time, or even quit because "they had to go". Which most likely, states the fact that they're not allowed to play at THAT time. IF you're not allowed to play at all, don't even start a game. Eh? Where was I? Oh yes, I have two alike features that might be able to solve that problem. http://www.thehomeplanet.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Or-not.gif

Feature 1: A new system that would let other players queue for other players in game that are requesting for a takeover. After that, if they both agree to it, then the player that queued would be in the game. Summoner name and all. BUT, the player who queues for it will be allowed to edit masteries for 20 seconds. Meanwhile the other person is possibly busy. It's a win-win.... right?

Feature 2: Basically the same but a bit harsh. Same thing as above but the person who queues has to switch without choosing yes or no.

3 Comments

GhastlyGhoulMan1 votes

Maybe this could be worked so this didn't happen, but I could see this being abused for ranked. What would the replacer get out of it, and how would the afker be punished?

chicken doodle1 votes

Easy, the replacer would get a 25% ip boost, while the afker gets punished accordingly. Oh wait! The point is that the afker doesnt get punished as harsh as what leaverbuster gives. Instead of lower priority, he has to wait 5-10 min. But if chat shows toxicity, the afker gets punished accordingly. And I clearly inserted a gif that said,"or not".

GhastlyGhoulMan1 votes

Well you seem to be coming across a little defensively to what was a sincere question, so not sure if you're really wanting a discussion.

Have a good day.

More from Gameplay

More by chicken doodle