[Suggestion] New champion requirement for Ranked

Melior·2/7/2017, 3:54:12 AM·3 votes·478 views

Noticing a good hunk of losses, not just my own, revolves around a player deciding to try a new champion and feeding everyone. Obviously everyone on each team could've done better to result in a win, but we all know what most teammates will do as soon as someone feeds in any elo :'). So my suggestion is having a requirement of minimum 10-20 games played with the champion before it's eligible to be picked in ranked. This would combine with the minimum 13(?) base champions players need to even queue for ranked. Less feeding, less raging community, less punishments; would make the community look slightly better.

6 Comments

Aptest2/7/2017, 3:56:53 AM3 votes

my suggestion is for both of us to have a banana split and a cup of hot cocoa.

also for you to forget you ever made this suggestion.

Edge of Daybreak2/7/2017, 4:04:18 AM2 votes

The problem with restrictions like this is that it doesnt take into account me losing those games. I could feed 20 games playing against diamonds and plats in normals and it doesnt reflect my ability to play that same champion against golds and silvers etc. Also some people just dont have the time to play normals that much. I have more ranked games on kayle this season than I do normal games on kayle in the past 2 years.

L Rayquaza2/7/2017, 4:11:35 AM2 votes

What about those people who have every champ and only play like 20 so that they can pick for their allies FP?

Zane Zephyr2/7/2017, 4:06:07 AM1 votes

Do you not understand how stupid this is? Playing 20 games does absolutely nothing. You can play a champion once and go 24-0 and play them 20 times and go 0-13.

How is it even remotely a good idea that maybe a certain champ would fit good in a team comp but "whoops didn't play 20 games with them get fucked"