Autofill
How is it fair for one team to have 4 people on their mains, while the other only has 2. This decides ALOT of games in team select and that just doesn't feel righ - no matter what side you are on.
How is it fair for one team to have 4 people on their mains, while the other only has 2. This decides ALOT of games in team select and that just doesn't feel righ - no matter what side you are on.
better q times amirite. fuck the balanced games. at least you waited 2 mins to get into a game where the kills are 5 / 30. hehe nice and fair game.
If only 2 are in their mains...... either you have too many people who are too restricted, or you have no communication.
Both of which generally means you lose anyways.
Dont you have anyone asking to swap roles? 3 whole people not in their main OR their secondary roles even in autofill is a bit too rediculous to not just be a lack of communication. The only way i can see it though is if there is.... for example.... 1 adc main, 1 support main, and they got their roles.... and EVERYONE ELSE was an ADC and Support main with the other as secondary.
If only 2 are in their mains...... either you have too many people who are too restricted, or you have no communication.
Both of which generally means you lose anyways.
Dont you have anyone asking to swap roles? 3 whole people not in their main OR their secondary roles even in autofill is a bit too rediculous to not just be a lack of communication. The only way i can see it though is if there is.... for example.... 1 adc main, 1 support main, and they got their roles.... and EVERYONE ELSE was an ADC and Support main with the other as secondary.
Even if we could the point is that the enemy team didnt have to. And that makes it unfair.
Lets go back to before all the changes to draft and it was only down to pick order then :)
Or perhaps 10 minute queues?
Go ahead and tell me you would rather wait 10 minutes for queue lol.
That is quite similar to having Low Priority Queue with less assurance that it actually how long its going to be. It could be 20 or it could be 2.
Ill almost bet that people have been doing their main role and fill for faster queue times :^) which guess what? Results in the same issue.
It has absolutely nothing to do with Autofill. The problem will always be there. There is no 100% way of getting out of or around it.
It is quite simply people need to learn how to play other roles as well.
Autofill is just a face to the problem you are JUST NOW seeing. So you try to bash its face in even though it is not the actual problem.
Lets go back to before all the changes to draft and it was only down to pick order then :)
Or perhaps 10 minute queues?
Go ahead and tell me you would rather wait 10 minutes for queue lol.
That is quite similar to having Low Priority Queue with less assurance that it actually how long its going to be. It could be 20 or it could be 2.
Ill almost bet that people have been doing their main role and fill for faster queue times :^) which guess what? Results in the same issue.
It has absolutely nothing to do with Autofill. The problem will always be there. There is no 100% way of getting out of or around it.
It is quite simply people need to learn how to play other roles as well.
Autofill is just a face to the problem you are JUST NOW seeing. So you try to bash its face in even though it is not the actual problem.
Autofill itself is a GREAT feature. But while it may not matter in lower elos (gold - bronze) in diamond and higher one autofilled player can make the whole match uneven. I dont mind being autofilled or having autofilled people in my team - i hate having more autofilled players than the enemy team. And thats it. Thats my problem with autofill.. id rather wait 10 minutes instead of 8 if the matches were actually fair.
Except you missed a part of my comments there.
What about those that do their main role and "fill" for lower queue times? People will always do that. Longer queue times will make it even more common.
This means your games will STILL be unbalanced.
Do not try to throw this whole bs of "it may not matter in lower elos" because it happens everywhere. Higher rankings just have less people to choose from.
It does not matter what elo someone is in because there is always some jerk thats going to be condecending you.
In higher rankings 1 person can mess up a game and in lower rankings 1 player can mess up a game.
This is not a good time to try to throw bs into the wind and see if it sticks on anything.
Except you missed a part of my comments there.
What about those that do their main role and "fill" for lower queue times? People will always do that. Longer queue times will make it even more common.
This means your games will STILL be unbalanced.
Do not try to throw this whole bs of "it may not matter in lower elos" because it happens everywhere. Higher rankings just have less people to choose from.
It does not matter what elo someone is in because there is always some jerk thats going to be condecending you.
In higher rankings 1 person can mess up a game and in lower rankings 1 player can mess up a game.
This is not a good time to try to throw bs into the wind and see if it sticks on anything.
This is not leading anywhere.. when one team has 1 autofilled player, the other should only have 1 too. And that's it. .
Fill is different than Autofill.
Autofill is forced.
Fill is a choice.
Same as it is a choice to not ban anyone.
Autofill does not mean you will be bad. Dont try ignoring the facts when you want to try to validate your very loose suggestion at a change that literally fixes nothing.
There are so many ways that can be explained of WHY it fixes nothing, but as you so well put... this is not leading anywhere.
You can lead a horse to water, but you cant make them drink.
Someone can only try explaining something to you, but if you dont want to actually spend some time to think about whats being said, that is not my problem.