Think about how ridiculous you are sounding tho, this is without league context
"this person's opinion is wrong because of his status" ad hominem isnt cool bro
Do you know what ad hominem is? It's using an irrelevant fact about someone to discredit their argument. Ad hominem would be if I said "You're opinion is worthless because you play X champ and I think X champ is OP and stupid". However, in this context your rank is completely relevant. A league rank directly shows how good you are at the game, and we are discussing game strategy: specifically whether or not a lane was gankable. If a challenger player says "that lane is gankable" and bronze 5 player says "no it isn't", who's opinion do you think is valuable, and who's is worthless? It's not ad hominem to say that a bronze 5 player's opinion is worthless in that situation, just like it's not ad hominem to say that a layman's opinion on how to properly design an airplane is worthless compared to that of an aeronautical engineer's. That was obviously an extreme example, you are far from bronze 5 and I am far from challenger, but the point still stands. I was too harsh in calling your opinion worthless, but all the same: I was actually in the game. I saw top lane, it was the enemy laner who was pushed, with no wards and no flash as well. I sure as hell didn't push mid lane, I was too scared to knowing that hecarim was riding my ass. Op top of that, I'm over a full division higher in rank than you and I main jungle, and it is my opinion that top lane could have been a feeding frenzy on that sion if Vi would have just ganked. Yet you just keep saying "nah you were probably pushed and that's why vi didn't gank". Who's opinion is more credible?
someone of higher could walk up to you and say you have no idea what you were doing, not fun is it?
Maybe not fun, but if a player significantly higher rank told me that I had no idea what I was doing, I'd probably believe them. I do have absolutely no idea what I'm doing compared to a diamond/challenger player.
you arent going to be very compelling without actually addressing the argument
What argument? Top lane was easily gankable, and our vi just flat out refused for no reason. That's not an argument that's a fact, one which I have clearly already stated.