Voting NO

HelpOrIFeed·1/21/2018, 7:51:02 AM·1 votes·315 views

Please put the names of each voter. I want to see the name of that one person who keeps voting no or those two people after 20. It shouldn't be anonymous. Oh a lower the number of votes required to three.

3 Comments

SEKAI1/21/2018, 8:00:21 AM5 votes

The point of voting is that you shouldn't be allowed to see who votes for who/what.

Also, the reason why the point of Yes is 4 people and not 3 is because the team only has 5 people, which let's be honest, the opinion of 3 people vs 2 isn't that big of a difference, and it is the same reason why we wouldn't put too much credit on the voting integrity of a choice made by 3 people where the outcome is 2 vs 1 (though it may be a slightly different story if the total number of the voters are even, but that's not the case here).

Not to mention, voting integrity aside, Riot also intends that games are supposed to be won by destroying nexuses. The voting is supposed to only pass when the game is unwinnable and there to cut unnecessary time wasting, which to that end Riot believes that if 4 out of 5 people believe the game is unwinnable, then it probably is really unwinnable. Hence the vote's passing benchmark is set at 4.

Hydra Headhunter1/21/2018, 8:01:31 AM2 votes

No. It's anonymous for a reason: and the problems voting being anonymous causes, it solves a lot more problemsome problems. For one, you (not you specifically, you in general) can't flame the people that want to keep playing the game and you can't with certainty report people that vote no, or people that vote yes.

Also, this happens more often than you think it does: the two people that vote no aren't always the same two people from one vote to another: sometimes they're the other two teammates, and everyone but you changed their minds.

When someone asks who voted no, I always respond "it's anon for a reason," it doesn't matter if I voted yes or no: I say "it's anon for a reason," because it is.