20 bans next season please

Popperofski·8/26/2018, 2:17:48 AM·98 votes·17,936 views

Too many champs, not enough bans, not enough nerfs on champions who are polarizing the meta in a negative way, riot balance team with not enough played time on their own game (thanks ghostcrawler), and simply put, there's no reason to keep expanding the champ pool without increasing these. You did it once before, do it again. Next season 20 bans. Ban phase before first pick, then another after the second pair of players pick their champions.

Make it happen. We don't want to ban just to get or ban just to get who is just as if not in some ways more broken than the former or ban just to get or ban just to get or ban just to go against
we want real variety in games, and want to really hit on the head who needs nerfs by who's banned.

111 Comments

MrFawknSunshine8/26/2018, 2:53:05 AM30 votes

so what 20 champs would you ban? top 4 in each role?

so lets say we do that... then the #5,#6and #7s in each role just become that much stronger cuz the alpha predators are "banned" then we are gonna want 30 bans and so on.

bans isnt how to fix balance

O for Orianna8/26/2018, 7:27:05 AM13 votes

games would be easier if they didn't had Zed and Yasuo

Alex h87218/26/2018, 2:51:58 AM12 votes

Factual, i need to be able to ban both Leblanc and Nocturne to keep my game cancer free

Bobloser35558/26/2018, 6:30:04 AM8 votes

I would like to have 2 ban for each person !

Nøctμrne8/26/2018, 5:55:31 PM6 votes

They could go back to where each player bans a champion separately to remove the possibility for duplicate bans. They will never do this because everything they do is with the intent of decreasing game duration, and apparently taking a few extra minute in champ select to have a better experienced isn't worth it.

BrightWîngs8/26/2018, 4:04:26 AM5 votes

in theory its a good idea but then people who actually play like Yasuo or Zed will almost NEVER be able to play the champs they like and thats not fair

Irelia Bot8/26/2018, 6:21:38 AM5 votes

Let's just give all players 20 bans with this logic.

Bans are not intend to remove everything that might be a threat or a nuisance.

They are intend to let you remove a champ that that is OP, counters you, annoys you or tilts you.

And it is not going to end up like you think it will. Get a group that decides to ban all but 1 decent jungler on blue team and you have given yourself an advantage in pick ban phase.

Skorch8/26/2018, 8:30:41 AM5 votes

Screw it, 130bans, only 10 champions get let through, then the bottom 10 champions need nerfs cause they are played every game

Thilmer8/26/2018, 2:17:52 PM4 votes

The fact that 10 bans are not enough shows that there is a massive champion unbalance rigth now.

You can't ban a champion that counters you, because then the enemy can pick a champion that does not counter you but is broke as balls and simply Rolls over all your team.

Even if people ban 10 broken champions, you would find at least two or three absurdly overpowered champions in that game.

Wolfeur8/26/2018, 8:54:51 AM4 votes

Oh yeah, let's just give a team the possibility to completely ban out an entire class of champions. Brilliant

ModCaptainMårvelous8/26/2018, 8:37:15 PM4 votes

I'm fine with 12-14 due to the roster being almost 150.

20 is too much.

ShadWooo8/26/2018, 11:13:14 AM4 votes

What about this.

Each player will be able to select secondary champion to ban. Such champion gets added into pool of additional bans. This pool will be shared by both teams.

When both teams select same champion for their primary ban, one random champion from the secondary ban pool will be selected instead.

This would allow to get more bans than we have now without making it riddiculous which 20 bans are.

Ideally we would like to get snake draft, but there are probably reasons why this is only for lcs.

Aimléss8/26/2018, 12:13:09 PM3 votes

Some of us actually want to play the champs you want perma banned. I know shocker right...

Agent Corgi8/26/2018, 6:03:31 AM3 votes

Ban phase before first pick, then another after the second pair of players pick their champions.

Instead of this, why don't we just give all 10 players two bans instead of one? There's currently 141 Champions in this game (Pyke Pyke being Champion 141) & a fairly good amount of champions that are just unfun to play against.

GodlyBane8/26/2018, 2:47:40 AM2 votes

Kindred got her W attack speed halved, and her R increased by 20 seconds.. shes rlly not that powerful and she so easy to deal with, I am yes a former kindred main and i know that kindred is a joke as it currently stands, she has a mere 50% winrate, nothing crazy

Kindred: http://na.op.gg/champion/kindred/statistics/jungle teir 2 Graves: http://na.op.gg/champion/graves/statistics/jungle teir 1

And akali is hilariously easy to lane against, its a joke just bait her Q, let her run out of energy, then one shot her.

agac42348/26/2018, 4:25:44 PM2 votes

this has to be one of the most stupide ideas i have ever heard lmao

TwitchTv AOrval8/27/2018, 3:50:10 AM2 votes

Ahri Aatrox Akali Alistar Annie Evelynn Fizz Graves Irelia Khazix Kayn LeeSin Leblanc MasterYi Malphite Rengar Pyke Zoe Zed Yasuo

What my 20 bans would look like

MrNuclearPumpkin8/27/2018, 6:33:16 AM2 votes

Ban every champion. Ban literally. Every single champion. Only Garen, Ashe, Alistar, Warwick, Sejuani and Sion should be allowed.

Tusutaki8/26/2018, 10:16:04 PM2 votes

Remember when back in season 3 when Kassadin and Leblanc (iirc) was absolutely overpowered? Fast forward to the present we have SEVERAL Kassadin tiers of champs to deal with almost all of which polarizes the game in a dramatic way. I also blame the new rune system since it adds in to the polarization. Youre a top lane melee against someone ranged? You MUST take Second Wind + Dorans Shield or else you're walking pile of gold.

Summonah123698/26/2018, 10:52:01 AM1 votes

Diana Diana Diana Diana Diana Diana

Spank the Fox8/27/2018, 3:47:35 AM1 votes

How about you learn to deal with champions lmao