Why do people complain about thresh so much when blitzcrank exists?

Cereal420·8/4/2017, 4:48:57 PM·1 votes·225 views

hes literally thresh but better. better hooks, a knockup, a big shield passive to make him tankier, a HUGE aoe silence on super low cooldown. I seriously don't understand how people can complain about thresh when blitz is a thing

5 Comments

Ralanr8/4/2017, 4:49:58 PM4 votes

Because Blitz can miss his hook and be pretty useless for 15 seconds. Thresh however is not.

Jmman8/4/2017, 4:53:06 PM4 votes

thresh has more cc and peel. Then lantern is pretty op. From a bruiser view yea blitz is strong. That is because he was a bruisier moved to support. Thresh was made support so give a little less offensive power and ALOT MORE defensive power.

The higher up you climb is less about having damage and more tank/cc/peel is better.

OurLestrade8/4/2017, 5:42:17 PM4 votes

Blitz just pulls, and half the time he pulls the tank in and helps them engage.

Sp33d Zer08/4/2017, 4:51:03 PM3 votes

Thresh has an aoe knock back, 99% slow, and can hook teammates.

That is why people complain about thresh

SanKakU8/4/2017, 7:19:07 PM2 votes

Thresh's Q stuns for like an eternity, he can also 'teleport' the enemy a very short distance which also disables and damages them like Blitz's knock up. Unlike Blitz, he has his own resource for scaling damage AND for shielding, which means his allies aren't going to get angry at him for 'KS attempting' by building AD/AP...because he doesn't need to buy that stuff for scaling. Those are the biggest differences that favor Thresh I'd say.