Severe lack of LCS champion diversity

It was picked or banned nonetheless; whether it's once or twice as a pocket pick or a confident and practiced pick by the team. Yet that's still such an issue to fans.

The issue that fans who have grieved regarding "LCS champion diversity" seem to not be used to how pro play seems to work. A pro player on a team doesn't just step on the stage and say to play something different for the fans and entertainment unless there's some trust in it or there's nothing to really play for. That's not how it works.

A bit of extra info: if you put all 5 premier regions together, you have about 84 Champions picked/banned collectively so far with just ONE patch of an entire season to come. That just shows there's even regional diversity let alone more champion diversity than what's been in recent history.

The problem is there is no way that every champ can be pro worthy playable.

61 out of 134 in two weeks isn't awful.

We nerf Syndra to the ground, someone will raise up and take her place. Balance is a fools game, it can never be. It has never been thus far and it will have been when the game dies out.

Simply number tuning will make or break champs and push them over or under.

dude thats almost half of the available picks, over all regions they've picked over 100 of the availalbe 130ish now?

{quoted}

Yeah as the guy above pointed out there are 61 for NA and 55 for EU. But for example in NA there have been 51 games which gives 510 champion picks(obviously they can't all be different) but in 510 available picks there have only been 61 unique ones, which means the same ones are picked over and over and over.

Well if they had used 120, we'd still seen them over and over. So your point is moot.