Skip to content

Rush is a detriment to the team at this point

C9 Scott Free ··5 votes·4,467 views

His inability to play front liners and inability to actually make plays early is legit screwing Cloud 9 out of games at this point. He needs to get a better champion pool and play some front liners so Jensen and Sneaky can carry.

80 Comments

CPU BIanc3 votes

Nidalee is useless especially when your gameplan is to not do crap with her for the first 25 minutes of the game. Bring back Meteos or even Hai in the jungle , at least they can play more than 1 champion.

YCitizenSnipsY3 votes

I've said it before Rush is a Solo que god but that's where it stops. Doesn't translate to competitive which is why no one picked him up in KR despite reaching #1 there. Neither of C9's imports have worked out for the better, but at this point NA seems hell bent on importing to solve their problem instead of trying to develop synergy between local talent.

Sad to see imports ruining a region the same way they did in china but oh well the wounds are self inflicted.

C9 Scott Free 2 votes

{quoted}

I've said it before Rush is a Solo que god but that's where it stops. Doesn't translate to competitive which is why no one picked him up in KR despite reaching #1 there. Neither of C9's imports have worked out for the better, but at this point NA seems hell bent on importing to solve their problem instead of trying to develop synergy between local talent.

Sad to see imports ruining a region the same way they did in china but oh well the wounds are self inflicted.

Jensen isn't bad but he seems far too reliant on a shot caller. Like to an unhealthy level

YCitizenSnipsY4 votes

Ive been in this argument before so I'm going to leave it alone. All I will say is C9 without Jensen > C9 with Jensen.

C9 Scott Free 2 votes

{quoted}

Ive been in this argument before so I'm going to leave it alone. All I will say is C9 without Jensen > C9 with Jensen.

I think Hai got mor flack than he should have from the community and that he didn't need to step down but his injuries make it sensible that he did. I don't know a mid that could take his spot at the moment though.

YCitizenSnipsY2 votes

They didn't look to bad with Link at All Stars 2014, but that isn't really a big enough sample size to say that he would have made a great replacement for Hai. I just think Jensen gets too much Hype for being #1 rank EU, he hasn't done anything all that note worthy since starting competitive and I don't really see an improvement in mid lane with him as opposed to Hai.

Imperial Red2 votes

I want C9VoyBoy. Not saying he's better, just want to see it.

TheMinionLeader1 votes

Jensen clearly beat Bjergsen in lane. (The Acclaimed best later in NA by Pros and Fans alike.) Granted maybe Corki is stronger than Viktor, So that could be a factor, but I believe Nidalee's late game decisions and low damage vs Champions output was the problem in this game. Svenskarens tank actually won that game. The four man flash knock up engage was the turning point. And He even recalled to help deal with the push top lane to save the inhibitor and was successful.

YCitizenSnipsY2 votes

When Gragas was considered the strongest mid laner in the game, so strong in fact that it was completely reworked to no longer be viable in the mid lane, Hai beat Bjergsen in that lane with a Soraka pick.

All I'm saying is I haven't seen the improvement in mid lane since Jensen has taken over. The team doesn't look any stronger with Jensen in the mid lane than when Hai was their midlaner. Everyone who pressured Hai to step down said he was what was holding them back. What has Jensen done for this team that Hai couldn't do in the mid lane?

MAGA MAN X 20202 votes

Did you miss the game last weekend when he carried C9 on Viktor and dodges skill shots as though he were in the matrix? Drop balls and sneaky, replace w any two random challenger level players, and C9 would have a team.

YCitizenSnipsY2 votes

Wow one game against a rebuilding CLG. Did you see the when he was getting shit on buy Ryu not to long ago. Dude is over rated and can't hold a candle to real mid laners. C9 went downhill as soon as they signed him, this is a fact. Neither Rush nor Jensen have done anything to benefit C9 or improve on what the old roster was capable of.

MAGA MAN X 20203 votes

The old roster was good at a time when NA was far worse than it is now. Balls is great compared to Dyrus... Compared to someone like Huni or Hauntzer, he can't hold a candle.

YCitizenSnipsY1 votes

The old roster was also able to take games off of Alliance and Najin in order to make it out of groups. And despite them getting fucked by drawing the #1 KR seed, were still close to making that a 5 game series.

But your right they looked so much better with Jensen almost getting regulated then going 0-4 and not getting out of groups. Been a real improvement for them in the mid lane. Original C9 > current C9 and its not even close.

Ale non è male2 votes

Man, you are delusional, the true comparison is not between S4 C9 and S5 Summer C9 before Hai got back, but between S5 Spring C9 that had the same historic C9 lineup and S5 Summer C9 after Hai got back

S4 C9 is the best team NA ever had and was a truly world class level team, S5 Spring C9 was rather bad and lost clearly for the first time since they got to LCS against S5 TSM, which theirselves were far worse than S4 TSM (a team kinda close to S4 C9 level) , a S5 TSM team that got stomped when they faced real competition at MSI and beyond

YCitizenSnipsY1 votes

LoL season 5 spring C9 placed the lowest they have ever placed in a regular split at 2ND place. They then went on to go all the way to the finals where they lost 3-1 to TSM. Yeah that's much worse than barely avoiding regulation by winning a tie breaker for 7th place.

Ale non è male2 votes

S5 Spring Season NA was truly terrible, even Summer S5 NA was better than that (TL, CLG, Gravity, Impulse before XWX got banned did a step ahead from S5 Spring) And C9 got that place in RS when there was Meteos jungling, with Hai jungling they ended up being at least the 3rd best team since they won the gauntlet for Worlds, looking better than what any team has looked in Summer except CLG (as they also beat TSM in last week of RS after the jungler swap), and were the best NA teams at Worlds

So yeah, after hai subbed in S5 Summer C9 was better than S5 Spring C9 that wasn't good at all and got 2nd only because of terrible Na competition aside from TSM

YCitizenSnipsY1 votes

Just because they slumped, and by slumped I mean getting second place in the region, in spring doesn't mean that the original C9 line up was through.

Look at how Different EDG and LGD looked from Spring to Summer. Hell even SKT struggled in the spring and they destroyed everyone at worlds. The spring split for C9 was not an indication that their original roster was going to start failing, and believe me they will never be that good again. Jensen just hasn't delivered at all. I'm sorry I know everyone hates to hear that, but honestly he isn't doing anything that C9 couldn't achieve with Hai in the mid lane.

Ale non è male1 votes

{quoted}

Just because they slumped, and by slumped I mean getting second place in the region, in spring doesn't mean that the original C9 line up was through.

...

The spring split for C9 was not an indication that their original roster was going to start failing

Balls, Hai, Lemon mechanical skills were clearly deteriorating and this was not due to a "slump" Lemon retired, Hai retired from mid lane (he was worse than Shiptur individually in Spring) and when C9 despreately need him back they putted him in a less intensive mechanical role (jungle, now support), Balls has now regressed till the point of being actually a sub-par NA top laner

The only one for which a "slump" could be argued at time because of other factors like adaptations to meta and such in S5 Spring was Meteos, but look where he is now, he is almost retired too (and C9 was giving him the chance to build his own Challenger team this off-season to make him comeback gradually to LCS)

C9 old lineup was just breaking down, and the 2nd place was just due to comlete lack of competition. The S5 Summer Split had much higher competition than the Spring Split one; people forget that in Spring TL had to play a tie break game vs S5 Spring T8 to get into playoffs, then beat a CLG team that was exploding with the Link drama (and despite this drama CLG was 3rd in RS), and managed to push C9 to 5 games placing then 3rd

In S5 Summer C9 historic line-up would have not going to be anything better than what C9 was after Hai got back in summer, when they ended up being the best Na team at Worlds and arguably the 2nd best team in a stronger Na competition in Summer (they got 3rd, and look arguably better than 2nd place TSM they couldn't battle in a playoff series to settle this)

iamleburk1 votes

Lol the only reason Cloud 9 won anything at worlds was because of Riot's dumb ass decision to release a huge patch before worlds. Their games were flukes, they happened on a better read on the meta than other teams, every team rolled dice on what would be meta and C9 happened to have a lucky roll. And when teams figured out how to beat C9, after teams now knew the meta and C9 no longer had that lucky guess advantage, they literally gave some of the easiest wins in the tournament.

Ale non è male1 votes

Cloud 9 at Worlds got their wins because of a series of lucky factors, first of all capitalizing with a cheesy comp on the worlds meta and the order in which they met the teams in first week, but still was the only Na team that had any idea of what to do there, because CLG and TSM looked really lost and executed well that comp...the only problem is that they got only 1 idea and once they got figured out they got beaten up by what were clearly superior teams

iamleburk1 votes

I agree that they lucked out on a comp and the games were too close together for teams to figure out how to counter it in time. However, I would argue CLG was the better team at worlds, and TSM might have been better but we didn't really get to see it because of their group (as much as it pains me to say it, i hate TSM lol. I loved watching them get buttfucked in that group).

CLG's first week was a legitimate good showing of their strength. Honestly, CLG beating Flash Wolves is much more impressive to me than C9 beating AHQ and FNC, because CLG didn't win off of pure luck, they just out-rotated and out player the other team. The problem is, CLG and KOO had the exact same style of play, (strong mid game shot calling, questionable jungler/mid with carries in bot and top) and it's REALLY hard to beat the Korean copy of your team. It was a really bad match up for CLG, they literally had no advantages to go off of. But of course the CLG players also have no perseverance, as soon as they lose one game apparently they tilt to shit.

Ale non è male1 votes

{quoted}

I agree that they lucked out on a comp and the games were too close together for teams to figure out how to counter it in time. However, I would argue CLG was the better team at worlds, and TSM might have been better but we didn't really get to see it because of their group (as much as it pains me to say it, i hate TSM lol. I loved watching them get buttfucked in that group).

CLG and TSM at Worlds sucked really hard CLG just crashed and burned once they recognize Zion(Darshan) couldn't carry agains international top laners like he did on NA and they weren't able to adapt their game. They won a game against Flash Wolves with FW running Kkramer at ADC that had a terrible showing and was replacing by the much better NL, and despite that the game was still shaky and pretty close for what I remember that both teams throw is not impressive at all, as that game could have gone either way and with a different ADC FW would have won that

TSM just continued on their terribad summer trand and offered some of the worst performance seen at Worlds from a team that wasn't Bangkok Titans in some of their losses and just won a game on a super slumping LGD that stomped them back in 2nd week

C9 was the only teams that had clear wins. Lukcy? Maybe, but the best win as far as smoothness go of the other two NA teams was probably CLG vs pain which is a wildcard team (a pretty good one for wildcard standards, but still far from high tier international teams)

iamleburk1 votes

No CLG played well until KOO tilted them off the planet. I think CLG had pretty good rotations for that game, so good in fact that some analysts started predicting CLG to beat KOO (After KOO dropped a game to flash wolves). Their win vs Flash Wolves was the most impressive win of any NA team there, and their win against Pain was still much cleaner than any of C9's wins. And even in their losses, CLG looked a lot better than C9. I just feel like CLG was the consistently better team, and C9 only looks better now because of some fuckery on the part of Riot.

I don't consider C9's fluke games, they only won because of Riot's dumb ass decision to drastically change the game before the biggest tournament of the year.

And I'm not really arguing for TSM, but they did get a pretty tough group, I would have liked to see how they played against H2K or IG.

Ale non è male1 votes

{quoted}

Their win vs Flash Wolves was the most impressive win of any NA team there, and their win against Pain was still much cleaner than any of C9's wins.

Nope. If you read any comment to the game, sloppy play from CLG was mentioned. And again, was FW with Kkramer they beat

https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/3n500g/spoiler_counter_logic_gaming_vs_flash_wolves_2015/

C9 win vs aHQ or iG was much cleaner than that, and ahq and iG > pain The problem is that you could sense that CLG simply was lost when they couldn't overpower their adversaries in lane and carry their advantage to the mid-late game and grab the win...basically a thing they were able to do twice in the entire tournament, while the other games they just lose even against not top tier teams

I don't consider C9's fluke games, they only won because of Riot's dumb ass decision to drastically change the game before the biggest tournament of the year.

C9 win weren't technically a fluke, they were just cheesy like for example the period where Gravity was in first place in NA Summer. NA in S5 overall never learned to play more than one meta at time, and when they got figured out they lost. TSM at MSi, CLG and C9 at Worlds, they had 1 way to win, and that way wasn't practicable vs top international competition

And I'm not really arguing for TSM, but they did get a pretty tough group, I would have liked to see how they played against H2K or IG.

TSM would have likely lost vs H2K. H2K was overpowered by EDG and SKT by sheer mechanical skills, but were never in trouble from a rotation/meta/understanding of the game point of view in their group...I don't think TSM would have overpowered them in the same way SKT and EDG did, so I think that in the end the better game awareness of H2k would have given them the edge IG was like LGD, it was totally dependant on them not tilting, because without tilting TSM would have been wiped out, with tilting those teams were losing against almost anyone

iamleburk1 votes

I see you bashing Kramer but I literally just watched Kramer hard carry CJ to victory against a top Korean team.

C9 definitely was a fluke, a fluke is a game that went the wrong way because of luck, and C9 got lucky in guessing at the meta.

We don't know TSM would have lost, that's what I would have liked to see. See your saying things like "this might have given them the edge" but that's all going off opinion. Regardless, I think it would have been a fairly close match and at the very least a very good match to watch.

Vs IG i think it depends on which Kakao shows up, but even that is speculation. Honestly I'm kind of annoyed that IG went over QG, because the only reason they went was because of (again) a fluke based on the new patch (China gauntlet was played on juggernaut patch). And most analysts agree QG would have been by far the better representative of China. I mean even right now they're undefeated in LPL.

YCitizenSnipsY1 votes

"The S5 Summer Split had much higher competition than the Spring Split one"

WTF no it wasn't, the top two teams in the region were TSM and CLG and they got fucking trashed at worlds. When you consider that those were two of the best three teams in the region, you really believe that summer split was better than spring. The old C9 had synergy, better than what they have now. And like I said in another post, Meteos is a better jungler than Hai, and they cant win without Hai. So tell me out it doesn't stand to reason that they were better off with the original roster than the mess it turned into before worlds?

Ale non è male1 votes

{quoted}

"The S5 Summer Split had much higher competition than the Spring Split one"

WTF no it wasn't, the top two teams in the region were TSM and CLG and they got fucking trashed at worlds.When you consider that those were two of the best three teams in the region, you really believe that summer split was better than spring.

TSM got trashed at MSI, C9 got trashed at Katowice (where TSM won when they were at their peak form, and didn't face any #1 team in their own region at that tournament, facing as best team during the competition S5 spring FW that was far inferior to Worlds FW) I'm sorry, but NA was terrible when they faced their equivalent international competition (#1 vs #1 team, #2/3 vs #2/3 teams of other regions) throughout the entire S5, so quoting international results doesn't really assess the strength of NA region in the season

S5 NA Summer was considerably better than S5 NA Spring, with the emergence of summer CLG, TL and even Gravity... the core problem is that NA lost so much ground in Spring leading to MSI in comparison to any other major region that even if they got some better in Summer they were so behind that they weren't even cloose to remove the gap, since all the other regions except China improved too in Summer, and NA fans were so busy overhyping their own region and trashing other regions that they started to recognize it only after TSM showing at MSI and thier consequent collapse, which deprived NA of their top international team in NA fans mind (top international team which TSM wasn't from half of Spring going forward, including their Katowice run)

The old C9 had synergy, better than what they have now. And like I said in another post, Meteos is a better jungler than Hai, and they cant win without Hai. So tell me out it doesn't stand to reason that they were better off with the original roster than the mess it turned into before worlds?

NOW they have a different team from S5 Gauntlet-World run...you are trying to mix up things to sustain your idea, which is just not correct, and you are doing it just because you kinda want to give incarnati0n/Jensen the blame for ruining the historic C9 line-up that in your mind was almost flawless and for forcing Meteos to retire...when the truth is different No one of S5 C9 versions were even close to S4 C9 line-up, and sadly, that S4 C9 line-up was greatly declining on their ownlike shown in S5 Spring The S5 Summer C9 team after Hai got back was better than S5 Spring team historic line-up, and the better version of C9 in S5, period. I don't care if you don't want to accpet it in your own close mind, but it just it this way, and you have not bring a valid point to sustain your argumentation that historic C9 line-up wasn't declining on their own and could have rebounded if changes were not done, while I pointed out that 2 guys retired, one wanted to retire but then was recalled and changed role being shifted to a less mechanically intense role because he couldn't stay anymore on mid lane, and one guy that stayed in his own role heavily regressed

iamleburk1 votes

Oh wow I didn't see this, this got pretty stupid. No, NA was shit last year, losing to TSM in Finals in NA is not impressive, because we saw exactly how effective that "dominant performance" proved to be against teams from regions that actually understood the game at that point. Dude I'm a huge NA fan, but last year was absolutely painful to watch. The teams were all so bad i felt like i was watching a challenger series or a wild card region. I hate seeing my favorite teams (literally any NA team but TSM) struggle so hard, but I'm also not delusional, because I'm able to recognize when my teams are struggling despite my bias.

YCitizenSnipsY1 votes

Lol If you think that the old C9 looked bad in spring then what do you call that summer performance. Here is a hint for you NA in summer was no better than in spring. The top two seeds in CLG and TSM got trashed at worlds, and no body else from NA is even worth mentioning. I would say that achieving second in a bad leauge is still better than 7th. Hell even the gauntlet run isn't as great when you consider that C9 was on the verge of losing to these bad teams twice.

If the old roster had stayed together for one more split, they could have likely fixed some of the issues they were facing. Lets face it Meteos is a better jungler than Hai and they aren't winning with him, it stands to reason that the old line up was still superior. I just think its funny that you based your whole argument over them declining off of a bad spring split, do you even know what a spring split is for?

iamleburk1 votes

I call yeah the reason they were so down in the standings was literally because of meteos. It was also incarnations fault, but him and Meteos did not get a long at all because Meteos just afk farms in his games and rarely ganks and that doesn't go over well when you're mid laner can and will carry games for you. The reason they did the gauntlet run is because they took meteos out of the team. Incarnation is also much better than Hai in terms of mechanics and champion pool. Do you remember season 4 worlds, where Hai went like 0/8 on Talon? Because that was supposed to be before his mechanics dropped off. Why have a player with shit mechanics and great shot calling in a role where you need mechanics and it takes a lot of focus to shot call from?

Picking up incarnation was a better move in the long run for the team because it's was clear Hai couldn't keep up with other talent and his problems were only going to get worse.

The whole idea of the roster move is that it would be a little tough at the beginning but eventually they would figure it out and be better off. Because as much as it pains you to believe it, that old C9 roster was not going to last, and they were already showing signs of decline. I agree that Rush wasn't the best pick up, because he doesn't know how to ward and neither does hai, but the Jensen pick up is an entirely different story, it completely changed the dynamic of the team and turned around the steady decline they were experiencing before hand~~~~

YCitizenSnipsY1 votes

So Jensen did bad early on becasue he didn't have a jungler who would babysit him, and your calling him a good midlaner? The midlaners in NA even with the imports are bad and he doesn't even look good there.

You talk about Hai's game on talon, have you seen Jensen's Zed? He apparently isn't aware that Zed has an ultimate. And I don't know where you get the Idea that he has a good champion pool from, He hasn't been consistently impressive on one champion yet.

Jensen is over rated bruh, you seem to be a fan of his and don't want to hear the truth but that's it. The only good games you can find of Jensen's are against low quality NA teams, he hasn't had a good performance against a real team yet. C9 won't get better going forward form here with Jensen in the mid lane. He is basically just the Pepii of NA, looks ok at times but there are many, MANY, better midlaners out there.

iamleburk1 votes

Yea, but then i saw Jensen play with a real jungler and I saw what he can do. Jensen currently has a bad mentality, really dependent on Hai, but with Hai he is top 3 in the league atm.

OH can you mention a game where he performed that bad and had hai on the team? Because that stupid shit doesn't happen when Jensen is playing on point. Why are you rating this player based on how he played when he didn't have hai when he plays so better with hai and currently plays with Hai?

I agree he is a liability when they switch in Bunny, but when they switch in Hai, he is top 3 in the league. Pepi is doing bad because he cant 1v9 anymore. I agree there are better mids in EU, but players tend to look worse when their team is shit.

You should really stop underrating Jensen off of the time he played with meteos because he hasn't been that bad in a while. That's like saying Smeb is overhyped as well because a year ago he was one of the worst top laners in Korea.

YCitizenSnipsY1 votes

I'm not under rating him becasue he's done nothing deserving of rating. He is NA that only has 2 native midlaners, thats how low the bar is there. And he still doesn't look good. You call him top 3? Pretty sure right now Bjerg, GBM, and Pobelter would be taken over him in a heart beat. He joined a team that was consistently top tier in their region for 2 years and single handily destroyed that, in the same region.

DREADN0UGHT1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Ale non è male,realm=EUW,application-id=9hBQwnEU,discussion-id=PE8whXGq,comment-id=00020000000000020000000000000000,timestamp=2016-01-31T23:17:59.048+0000)

S4 C9 is the best team NA ever had

IMT is going to shrek that rep.

Ale non è male1 votes

Well, it would be good for NA if IMT manage to do that this season and surpass them :D

DREADN0UGHT1 votes

NA world finalist class team? Possible. Lets wait and see.

Ale non è male1 votes

{quoted}

NA world finalist class team? Possible. Lets wait and see.

Don't set the bar so high so soon for them in the season, win 2 games at Worlds QF against a top team would yet mean surpass what the best teams in NA history did :D IMT just need to work calmly and see what happens going forward in the season

iamleburk1 votes

Ryu is really good... Jensen has done a lot to improve the roster, he held his own against the likes of Febiven and Maple at worlds. The problem is, he seems to rely on hai a bit, perhaps their really great friends or hai just gives him the confidence he needs to succeed or maybe hai is a rock that doesn't let him tilt, but there is no question that Jensen is a top tier mid laner in NA atm.

MAGA MAN X 20202 votes

C9 fanboys just blow my mind. The reason Rush was MVP last season is because, quite frankly, he is the greatest jungler in NA. The problem is he's playing 4v5 as C9 does not have a top laner. Balls got caught out numerous times, literally contributed nothing to the team, and his mastery of basically all meta champions is subpar at best. Rush, alternatively, is bar none the highest skilled player on the team by leaps and bounds, he's just surrounded by trash cans.

C9 Scott Free 2 votes

{quoted}

C9 fanboys just blow my mind. The reason Rush was MVP last season is because, quite frankly, he is the greatest jungler in NA. The problem is he's playing 4v5 as C9 does not have a top laner. Balls got caught out numerous times, literally contributed nothing to the team, and his mastery of basically all meta champions is subpar at best. Rush, alternatively, is bar none the highest skilled player on the team by leaps and bounds, he's just surrounded by trash cans.

You think Sneaky is bad which is a sign you are Rush fanboying if anything. Sneaky is the best player on C9 and not even my favorite player lol. Rush isn't carrying so he needs to stop playing carries it is really that simple. If he played more utility he could actually make plays and get his team ahead and carry without gimping his team if they fall behind.

MAGA MAN X 20201 votes

http://www.lolesports.com/en_US/na-lcs/na_2016_spring/stats Click through every single performance measuring metric. Sneaky is between middle and worst of every single player on C9 and generally one of the worst ADCs in the league. By what standard do you consider him to be the best?

Ale non è male2 votes

Sneaky was definitively the best C9 player last season and the individual performances of this start of the season have to be taken with a grain of salt because C9 has wider overall problems that make everyone underperform

iamleburk1 votes

I would suggest using oracle elixir instead

YCitizenSnipsY1 votes

When some one like Rush can climb all the way to #1 on the KR server and no one in that entire region makes him an offer there is a problem. NA looked weak as ever in season 5 which is why he shined. But to put it bluntly he doesn't have what it takes to win against real competition. I think he is a great player but he is certainly been a disaster for C9 so far.

iamleburk1 votes

Reignover is better this season. Rush wasn't that good, he was MVP because his closest competition was fucking Xmithie and Santorin so he had scrubs he could shit on. But then people figured out how to counter his predictable ass strategy and now he is a liability. Not to say he will remain a liability, but he has to improve his pathing or seriously alter his predictable play style for him to start helping rather than hindering the team.

MAGA MAN X 20201 votes

No he was MVP because he redefined what it meant to be a carry jungler and put up ADC levels of damage/kills. His closest competition was the other 49 starters in the entirety of the NA LCS... When he got caught out going for DIG's blue, it wasn't predictable pathing that ruined him, it was the fact that shiphtur reacted and made a play while Balls, being the complete and utter trashcan he is, stood there. The same casters that gave you that terrible idea are the same casters that announced DIG as the winners as their Nexus died... Also do note that Rush was barely behind sneaky in overall damage in yesterdays game, while accounting for over half of the kills...

iamleburk1 votes

No, I've seen the games vs TIP last split in the play offs. I've seen how C9 handled TIP last split in the gauntlet. I've seen H2K handled C9 at IEM. And now I'm seeing how NA has finally adapted to Rush's play style. He shat on NA before because NA was in one of it's worst splits in the history of League. Rush is a greedy ass player, that's why he gets all the kills, but greed is punishable in competitive. And now you see even the low tier teams learning how to punish him.

Also to say he redefined what it meant to be a jungler is the biggest crock of shit I've ever heard. iwilldominate and diamond prox were the OG agro junglers, back when junglers barely did anything, well before Rush was in the scene, and Swift, Spirit, Clearlove, Chaser, Jankos, Kakao and Dandy have similar play styles and have had those play styles prior to rush being in the scene and still being better than Rush at it (with the exception of Kakao, Kakao fell off really hard recently).

And we don't just rate players off of "well he's aggressive so he's the better jungler". We rate them based on the effect they have on the rest of the team. Currently, Rush taking more risks than rewards, and Reignover is consistently setting up plays all over the map, and his jungling (unlike rush's) hasn't lost an LCS regular season game since spring split last year. So Reignover's jungling might not be as aggro as Rush's, but it's clearly been more successful, so are we really just congratulating Rush for his style or can we actually evaluate his play?

MAGA MAN X 20201 votes

It's alot easier to set up plays when you have a top laner and a support...

iamleburk1 votes

Yea that's literally some of the most important part of being a jungler, having synergy with your players. Reignover also recently developed synergy with Wildturtle. Sneaky and Jensen are top tier in NA, a good jungler gets his lanes ahead, but Rush never gets synergy with his teammates because he still think's it is solo queue. Do you remember FNC's bot lane last year? How's that Yellowstar guy doing now? You can't just keep blaming the weak links on a team for a players mistakes.

Rush is good for NA, but Reignover is a world class jungler. Rush makes some mechanical outplays and gets himself fed, while Reignover actually goes out and snowballs his lanes and wins team fights. Rush's style worked fine in the shitfest NA was last split, but mark my words if he doesn't change he might be as weak a link as Balls this split (against teams that know how to exploit him, but if even DIG are starting to figure it out). Yea maybe he'll look good against Echo Fox or Renegades, but he will be a liability against IMT, NRG, CLG, or TSM.

iamleburk1 votes

Hey, btw, if you want a really strong early game jungler, watch Peanut on ROX tigers. Last year, Rush had the most kills + assists at 15 minutes of any jungler of any region (3.1), but he also had a pretty high death rate (.8). Peanut currently has kill + assists pre 15 minutes at 3.2 with literally half the death rate.

Comparing Peanut's current stats to Rush's Summer Season stats (where he was shitting on NA junglers like crazy), Peanut has much higher CS, higher DPM, higher KDA, and higher wards cleared, all while having a lower gold share and a much lower death share. AND this guy is a rookie, only having one game before this split (As a sub for Najin last year). Here is an article comparing him to the guy who is best at standard jungling in KR https://unikrn.com/community/peanut-vs-score-koreas-best-jungle-talent/

Also today there was a really great jungle game by this guy Crash on his debut. He subbed in for Longzhu in their one win vs CJ and completely wrecked the other jungler. He wrecked the other jungler in game 2 also but it wasn't enough to stop the late game ezreal unfortunately. Either way, that looks to be the best debut performance of a rookie since Faker.

More from Esports

More by C9 Scott Free