Can someone explain why C9 is punished but Bjergsen owning psrt of TSM is fine?
Lcs ruling today punishes C9 for including stock as compensation, how come theres no problem with Bjergsen as an owner player in TSM? Curious
Lcs ruling today punishes C9 for including stock as compensation, how come theres no problem with Bjergsen as an owner player in TSM? Curious
C9 has been doing it for who knows how long behind riot’s back.
TSM went to riot and worked out a deal to allow this.
i think the difference is the C9 players arent actual owners but share holders like if any one would buy stock in any company. where as Berj contract gave him % ownership of TSM.
now why does it matter to RIOT i dont have a clue, a lot of companies offers employees stock options but that by no means state they are owners or controlling partners of said business
Because riot felt bad for sneaky and decided to take it out on the C9 team that screwed him over. Fk C9 coaching
OH I didn't realize there was an exception for longtime players of a brand like Stixxay and Bjerg. That makes sense. Thanks for the info guys!
As for the reason players aren't supposed to own stock, I always figured it was a match fixing based rule, but who knows.