80 Comments
bumping this for vis. My guess is its a bot that looks for combos of words. Bots aren't perfect, and at least to my untrained eye the post isn't in the wrong (mods correct me?). Sorry this happened friend, bots aren't perfect :S.
I was gonna say it's probably from the "Live Matter" thing, which has an obvious political slant out-of-context.
I was gonna say it's probably from the "Live Matter" thing, which has an obvious political slant out-of-context.
Strange like here on EU (italy) that prhase has no political meaning [zombie-nunu-bummed]
Hello Bazerka!
I had discussed with the other mods about this before taking action. It was deemed that this post was political(which is as mentioned by electro against universal rules) and the title was bait. I hope I explained myself. Pleased to meet you. [sg-soraka]
~KittySuppSquad [sona-playing] [sg-soraka]
The post was political? Literally talking about how duskblade makes it hard for supports to keep good vision control but sure it was totally political.
[{quoted}](name=Bob the Toastr,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=tAGdH3tc,comment-id=000000030000,timestamp=2018-07-07T05:58:36.467+0000)
The post was political? Literally talking about how duskblade makes it hard for supports to keep good vision control but sure it was totally political.
Apparently everything can be distorted in to having something to do with Blacks nowadays.
I would make a joke but mods would probably smite me faster than Usain Bolt can run 100 metres.
You are playing with fire my dude. I mean Usain Bolt is quite black... You might not be allowed to mention him like that.
Damn dude, you can't just throw the B-word around like that. Someone might get offended.
Assuming genders now are we Weiss? I am, soooooffended!
(+50)
{quoted}I would make a joke but mods would probably smite me faster than Usain Bolt can run 100 metres.
Nah, that only gives 9.58 seconds to work with. Dude's fast.
But he is not the fast
We both know that wasn't all the thread discussed.
It was all. Everyone in that thread knew and discussed duskblade and vision. How horribly offensive for topic not to degrade into political bullshit.
Except it actually did, so I don't know who you think you're fooling.
It's in the name of the thread," Wards Lives Matter", it's a very obvious link to ,"BLM". Also, as according to a Herald above, it's mocking a controversial group, even if unintentionally, and apparently a comment chain broke out concerning it. So yeah, the post might not have been made to spew a political opinion, but it still contained political terms that sparked some arguments.
Hello Bazerka!
I had discussed with the other mods about this before taking action. It was deemed that this post was political(which is as mentioned by electro against universal rules) and the title was bait. I hope I explained myself. Pleased to meet you. [sg-soraka]
~KittySuppSquad [sona-playing] [sg-soraka]
Wow this is sad that its downvoted so much :(, but I appreciate you taking action! Again was just calling attention to it since I didn't have full context :). Gj!
Wow this is sad that its downvoted so much :(, but I appreciate you taking action! Again was just calling attention to it since I didn't have full context :). Gj!
Eh, downvotes schmownvotes. It's all part of the moderator experience: every decision has it's proponents and it's detractors, and borderline cases like this one are watched closer than most. C'est la vie. :)
All good bb :)
Hah, nice cover-up. Typical Riot ponzi scheme. Everyone knows the mods are up to no good. Yep. No good at all.
. . .
Wait a second...
bumping this for vis. My guess is its a bot that looks for combos of words. Bots aren't perfect, and at least to my untrained eye the post isn't in the wrong (mods correct me?). Sorry this happened friend, bots aren't perfect :S.
Please do us the favor of UN-Deleting the thread the mods unjustly deleted and give them a stern talking to, some of them have been on a bit of a power high lately.
bumping this for vis. My guess is its a bot that looks for combos of words. Bots aren't perfect, and at least to my untrained eye the post isn't in the wrong (mods correct me?). Sorry this happened friend, bots aren't perfect :S.
On top of this, i have a personally problem in Lol's forums which i disrespect a lot and found it too frustration to me. i have read the universal rules of boards many time before and there is something which i don't understand.
We dont tolerate posts that discuss,
- Religion
- Sex
- Politics
- Any social issues, though some exceptions may be appropriate.
Okay, Now what do they mean by Sex? Sexuality of characters? The outlook of characters? Sex overall? Sex bite threads?
I have seen a millions of them everyday that bite the bull's-eye of a large sexuality thread with UPVOTES and is not deleted. My problem that i open Lol's forums to watch news, get some memes, to discuss some stuff, to complain about in-game stuffs, to check what is new, i'm from Eune even though i'm pretty sure that i'm welcomed here.
But now i open Lol's forums and i find many threads that bite bit of sexual attitudes with a large mean topics like (Hotter) (Boobs of Morgana) (Boobs of Ahri) etc, And we all know these kind of threads are meant to bite of sexual attitudes in the Lol's forums. which is not allowed in the universal rules.
Please correct me if i'm wrong.
[poppy-wink]
Hey there, guys and gals.
Wanted to pop in and give an update on this situation. I have looked into it, and, while the thread in question did have a comment chain that violated board rules and a title that was a bit too politically charged for the boards environment, I think there's a middle ground that can solve these issues and allow for the thread's restoration.
I will be reversing the deletion, but I will be removing the problematic comment chain and also editing the title of the post, which does mock a fairly controversial socio-political topic and, as such, is not really something we want around. Normally we do not do this sort of content edit, so this is an exception to our usual policy in this particular instance -- future instances will likely end up removed, with the OP encouraged to repost the thread without the offending title. I'll make sure the team knows to include this clarifying line in future removals as well, as I notice it was not included here.
I'd be interested in hearing the community's input on this policy as well -- we're open to discuss changing this rule if the community would rather moderation do content edits on threads that have rule-breaking elements but have been left up long enough to get actual discussion going.
Edit: The post has been restored. You can find it here. OP, please let me know if you'd like me to change the new title to a different one of your choosing.
Thanks for understanding and i really like your way of resolving it. I dont have any problem with the new title. I think it suits content well enough with proper sound to it.
Thank you and Bazerka for giving it your attention and everyone that commented and upvoted on this thread. This could have easily went unnoticed otherwise.
{quoted}Thanks for understanding and i really like your way of resolving it.
My pleasure! Glad we have a resolution you're okay with.
In the future you're always welcome to come to the Discord or, if you feel it needs escalation, ping a Herald. I'm usually around within a few hours, and the other Heralds will also be happy to assist when they're available.
That said, while I do understand your frustration and your perspective, the accusations of insanity are not the most helpful to efficient resolution. Our moderation team does make mistakes (or, in this case, discretionary decisions that, while not incorrect by our official policies, could have been resolved in a better fashion), and having a friendly discussion tends to be my preferred method of reaching a resolution faster and with less conflict on both sides. It makes it easier for everyone to approach the problem with the other side's good intentions in mind -- something I think caused some miscommunication in this thread, and something we as a moderation team will try to do better on in the future. <3
I dont have any problem with the new title. I think it suits content well enough with proper sound to it.
Perfect! I actually spent a little while trying to pick the right slightly meme-y replacement, and I'm happy to hear it appeals. Best of luck with the thread!
You do realize that the only people that would understand this sort of political innuenda would have to be fairly mature people who understand the joke.
This is just childish.
Hello there!
Given that we've come to a complete resolution of the issue thanks to The Djinn, I'm going to take steps to clean up this thread now. Disagreement with us is okay, but when the conversation devolves into bringing insults to people, that's where the conversation becomes less viable. Further, insulting anyone on the Boards is against the Universal Rules, which are also in full effect here.
Djinn's post is still the top pinned response for a reason, I'm simply replying to his comment so that visibility and transparency of the decision is available simultaneously.
If you find yourself getting a notification from me, it will be because I've gone through and cleaned up the thread.
If you have questions, feel free to talk to us in the The Boards Moderation Discord or the Discuss the Boards sub-board.
Let's just behave! -Said no one ever. ---Totally Not Jinx
Some of the mods aren't too bright I mean look at this
It was removed due to the comments section getting out of hand.....and also the title provoking said comments.
Normally, we would just lock up the comments of a thread going political, but in this instance, since the title of the thread was essentially asking for a political discussion to happen, and that one had already gotten out of hand, the mod that removed the post, along with advice from other mods as well, decided to just outright remove it.
Feel free to repost it if you want, just please use a different title. If a discussion carries over from that thread, we will remove the comments as necessary.
or this
Hello Bazerka!
I had discussed with the other mods about this before taking action. It was deemed that this post was political(which is as mentioned by electro against universal rules) and the title was bait. I hope I explained myself. Pleased to meet you. [sg-soraka]
~KittySuppSquad [sona-playing] [sg-soraka]
Guess the mods can't handle a thread anymore, so they remove it instead of moderating it properly?
My post got removed for naming and shaming, even though the only name that wasn't censored was mine :D.
The mods must be my old literature teacher from high school. All this "he said this but could potentially mean this" non-sense belong in the lectures.
Had he then proceeded to make a bunch of insensitive comments meant to stir up prejudice in his OP, this action might have been reasonable. However, he instead just whined about Duskblade.
Bro your title was clearly stated in the most political way possible, and you should definitely have taken care of your own comment section to avoid others saying bad stuff smh
/s
Love how all the ((mods)) have gone quiet and can't even provide a reasonable argument as to why they deleted your thread.
Love how all the ((mods)) have gone quiet and can't even provide a reasonable argument as to why they deleted your thread.
Most of us are in EST-through-PST, so a lot were asleep. I took a personal look a few minutes ago, and an update is pinned to this thread. <3
[{quoted}](name=The Djinn,realm=NA,application-id=6heBIhQc,discussion-id=tAGdH3tc,comment-id=00090000,timestamp=2018-07-07T15:17:32.971+0000)
Most of us are in EST-through-PST, so a lot were asleep. I took a personal look a few minutes ago, and an update is pinned to this thread. <3
Thanks Jhin. You're one of the few actual Mods that deserve it.
{quoted}Thanks Jhin. You're one of the few actual Mods that deserve it.
You're welcome, although I'd personally appreciate it if we could back off the rest of the team. Everyone tries their best and was chosen due to their dedication to making the boards a better place, but some people have more experience than others, some people are better at communicating their reasoning in a community-facing way than others, and none of us -- myself included -- will ever be beyond improvement. It's much more helpful to me -- and to the entire team -- when feedback is constructive, friendly (if frustrated), and actionable rather than a blanket statement like this.
In short, give us stuff we can work with and we'll try our best to make improvements in those areas, but critique like this doesn't help our team improve in ways that make the boards a better place.
tbh I have no problem with shitposts like this being removed.
If the mods would delete every post like this maybe Riot would actually take their own gameplay boards seriously again. Because we sure as hell don't need the 1000 post complaining about Assassins and duskblade being broken while making literally 0 suggestions.
Soooo... Making suggestions does not count as making suggestions anymore? Damn this is difficult... Should i have made separate paragraph titled in bold suggestion?
And what is your suggestion?
Argument: It is BS and has no justification, which isn't even true. Suggestion: Just remove it without compensation, because fuck Assassins.
10/10 quality post we never saw before. Great suggestion. That's as good as all the posts that suggest "just lower damage by 10%, trust me, it won't break anything and fix the game". These usually get around 30 upvotes too, by people who are flat out retarded and actually believe that is a good idea.
Meanwhile other well thought out posts get downvoted because they aren't circlejerking, but as soon as you add something like "duskblade broken" or "Why is AD better than AP" or "mobility OP" you instantly get to hot.
Just look at the fcking hot page. This is the top post:
How come mobile champs are allowed to do more dmg than most immobile champs? Why can yasuo both out dmg and block and shield dmg from an annie? Why can Camille jump around the map and deal more true dmg to a target than darius with full stacked ult?why is this allowed design wise?
This are just arguments that are pulled out of the ass and not even proven by anything, most of them aren't even true, and not even one suggestion or something useful is in the post. Still 83 upvotes, front page. Clap, Clap.
Congrats, and then the people here wonder why Riot doesn't give a fuck about their own boards, which is honestly good because else the game would completely go to shit.
Ya know i would like to ask you something like
Argument: It is BS and has no justification, which isn't even true
Then what is your justification for it?
Suggestion: Just remove it without compensation, because fuck Assassins.
What do you mean by IT. Passive or an item itself and such. But i wont. This is what i created THAT topic for. To discuss that passive of duskblade. Shame that we cant discuss gameplay related stuff in gameplay related boards. Not gonna risk doing it here.
- Apparently its political
- And its actually off-topic.
Dont bother answering about duskblade.
Meanwhile other well thought out posts get downvoted because they aren't circlejerking,
I had my share of such topics. Thats why i decided to keep it simple and clickbaity. Otherwise you wont get attention and most people wont understand what you are talking about. Its especially hilarious when post with essentially the same point but which does not catch the actual issue gets 30+ upvotes at the same time. And its even more hilarious when riot releases patch that decreases dmg on someone for once. Cuz "ups, actually it became evident that we fucked up". But you got downvoted for saying where exactly two month ago.
Also to be honest i was pretty sure that most people have no idea about one function of duskblade. Even though i mentioned it in my post it was clear that most people still have no idea. Or they dont realize how broken is that. But it looks like its former. Considering how toxic and game breaking it is for me i didnt want to give it better explanation or unnecessary attention. Less people know about it - the better. So whole post became kinda muddy.
Then what is your justification for it?
Because the passive actually adds to the playstyle of Assassins and the item would be shit without it.
Also to be honest i was pretty sure that most people have no idea about one function of duskblade. Even though i mentioned it in my post it was clear that most people still have no idea. Or they dont realize how broken is that. But it looks like its former. Considering how toxic and game breaking it is for me i didnt want to give it better explanation or unnecessary attention. Less people know about it - the better. So whole post became kinda muddy.
So you rather make a short post to farm upvotes than something well thought out, because people don't know how duskblade works and you don't want them to know about it? what? I'm pretty sure everybody knows about the duskblade passive, it's the whole identity of the item.
Also your post didn't really look like you wanted to "discuss" the passive of duskblade. That was just "Let me complain about duskblade, farm upvotes and downvote everyone who disagrees" kind of post we definitely already have enough of. Don't tell me you actually wanted to open up a discussion with that kind of wording.
Don't tell me you actually wanted to open up a discussion with that kind of wording.
I wanted and i actually did. I also wanted to bring attention to the part of duskblade that i wanted to bring attention to. 6k views... Cant say i succeeded at that but gotta give thx to mods for that. Removing topic when its up in hot.
I'm pretty sure everybody knows about the duskblade passive, it's the whole identity of the item.
Whole identity that was added almost 2 seasons after it got released and then reworked?
So you rather make a short post to farm upvotes than something well thought out, because people don't know how duskblade works and you don't want them to know about it? what?
Yea i would like to bring light to issue without getting any demerits myself. Cant blame anyone for that.
And there is absolutely no point in writing wall of text on something that can be explained in 10 words. It does not add it any real credibility or makes it any better for the reader.
If you can make it short - do it.
Whole identity that was added almost 2 seasons after it got released and then reworked?
You always had the ability to see where the enemies have vision, and the ability to clear enemy wards has also been there for years. The only version of duskblade that didn't have it was the initial release.
Yea i would like to bring light to issue without getting any demerits myself. Cant blame anyone for that.
And there is absolutely no point in writing wall of text on something that can be explained in 10 words. It does not add it any real credibility or makes it any better for the reader.
If you can make it short - do it.
However, you didn't even elaborate why it is a issue. Just saying that it's BS isn't an argument. That post really didn't add to anything. If I read a post, I want to know something after that I didn't before, even if it's long. A good post should point out issues, elaborate why it is an issue and have interesting suggestions that you haven't seen 100 times already, and isn't just suggesting to remove something that would fuck over an entire class.
You always had the ability to see where the enemies have vision, and the ability to clear enemy wards has also been there for years.
Ability to oneshot wards been added in 8.6. Before that assassin had choice - to clear ward or ignore it. In first case you lost vision from it but got yourself some time while he was at it. In second case ward would at least stay alive for some time giving you information.
Passive that tells you where enemies have vision without having to waste red trinket is just OP.
isn't just suggesting to remove something that would fuck over an entire class.
So having something that fuck ups every other entire class for some of which warding is sacred duty is okay? And removal of it wont impact actual dmg from from assassin and therefore their ability to be useful in fights. But will give people more counterplay. (warding kinda the best counter to DB users)
The ability to OS wards was added to compensate for nerfing duskblade cause ranged champs were abusing it. But apart from that:
Assassins are kind of not the strongest class. People always say that they are op af but that usually comes from silvers who just don't know, or flat out refuse to learn how to play against them.
Pro play shows us that the Assassins which boards claim to be OP, and especially Duskblade, are far from strong.
If Duskblade is so OP, why didn't I see a single duskblade user in Rift Rivals? I literally just checked the last few match histories and didn't see a singe Duskblade.
They don't even build it on Pyke, who is picked pretty frequently, and usually go for
and
first.
You can't even come at me with the argument that it's something else in pro play, because pro play actually resolves far more around the vision game and especially vision denial, so Duskblade should by your argument be even more broken in pro play to deny vision. But not even the support Assassin champ rushes it. Now why is that? I highly doubt that is because they are forbidden to build it.
Here is the actual reason:
Duskblade is not broken There, I said it, fuck me right?
gj you won, you beat me. duskblade is not op. And Yes fuck you cuz this is fucking off-topic here and i asked you to go to restored thread for duskblade discussion and not to reply on it here and you just keep going. [zombie-brand-clap]
Thing is, I noticed that you are actually a person willing to make discussion so I kind of was wrong on you at first.
So I would rather reply down here where probably no one sees it than making a fresh comment on the other post because I know that when I wake up tomorrrow my inbox would be flooded by ~20 hate comments that are essentially just something like "REEEE, Duskblade does damage, it's OP!!!" Sadly, I know this boards too well and it's kinda rare to actually find people that are open to a discussion in the first place, so rarely even try anymore.