Skip to content

Nemesis Drafts really reveals people's intelligence

Narasimha··5 votes·814 views

We were facing an Anivia, an Azir, a Nami, a Blitz, and a Janna So of course, the Rammus on our team decides to build Thornmail, Randuins, Ninja Tabi, and Frozen Gauntlet.

This is why we can't have nice things.

15 Comments

AMYS GRAVE3 votes

Rammus is building for towerdiving. His passive also means that he's building AD you realize.... If he initiates the dive then he can tank the turret for days while you mop up the enemies.

Narasimha1 votes

If he initiates the dive

Ok, got and take ONE more look at the comp I mentioned. If you can find a way to dive that with a Rammus, PLEASE let me know.

Incidently, the rest of our team was Nunu (me), Cass, Zyra, and AD Kennen.

redniwediS3 votes

Intelligence has nothing to do with knowledge. Not everyone understands item builds, some people just build items they are told to take. This does not make them stupid, it just shows their lack of understanding.

Ronnie Law1 votes

Could you explain the difference please?

redniwediS2 votes

Intelligence is used to describe an entities capabilities, particularly when it comes to problem solving and other mental tasks.

Knowledge is used to describe an entities familiarity with certain information.

If you want something more in depth you can look it up yourself.

Ronnie Law1 votes

A lack of specificity. Not surprised.

There is no way to be Intelligent without having Knowledge.

Knowledge is a prerequisite for Intelligence.

It doesn't matter how quickly and efficiently, accurately or intuitively data is processed if there is no data TO process.

Operating without information is no better then flipping a coin, and when you don't know something, you'd best understand THAT at least.

So yes, doing what you are told, blindly, without questioning the authenticity or validity of a given data set is almost by definition, stupid. It certainly isn't the hallmark of a thinking entity.

redniwediS2 votes

Lack of specificity, or am I just unwilling to support laziness? You want definitions look them up, not everything is going to be hand fed on your request.

Ronnie Law1 votes

Just keep backpedaling.

redniwediS2 votes

Right, because I no longer support my original statement. Are you actually reading what I'm typing, or are you just guessing?

Specificity arguments are somewhat fine, but not when you're arguing about definitions, which are easily looked up by anyone who's not lazy. I think we're done here.

Ronnie Law1 votes

I didn't question THE definition. I questioned YOUR definition.

As soon as I did you switched gears and called me lazy instead of continuing the discussion.

This implies that not only were you wrong in what you said, but that you were AWARE of your mistake, and instead of simply stating, "Yeah, that was probably not phrased properly" OR "I meant to say...", you instead went to personal credibility attacks on someone who disagrees with you.

Brilliant.

I should expect as much from someone who has a flawed conceptualization of Intellect.

redniwediS2 votes

I called you lazy because you used a specificity argument when I said "you can look it up yourself". If you're unwilling to look it up you need to take what you get, not insult whoever is willing to give some answer to your question.

I never used a custom definition, I never switched gears, and I worded everything to mean exactly what I meant. If you read it wrong that's on you, not me. Your change of tone between posts is startling enough to fully justify my comments, and for that I offer no apology.

You can read what I say as personal attacks all you want, but like I said before we're done here. The last word is yours if you want.

EDIT: And please actually look up what you're arguing about before you argue about it. You literally asked what the difference is and have shown no knowledge of the actual definitions in your posts.

Sukishoo4 votes

Everyone should know though to build some kind of MR when fighting a full AP team, that's called Common Sense. Just like when fighting a full AD team you would want to bring Armor.

redniwediS2 votes

It's common sense to you because you understand it already. Some people literally play while only building recommended items on champions that are meta at the time. Others, like you and me, think a little deeper into counter building and counter picking.

I don't know why some people don't care to learn, but they are out there in large numbers.

Narasimha2 votes

I mean, if you can get to level 30 without learning that "armor = anti physical " and "MR = anti magic", then I'm more impressed then surprised.

Killer X 122 votes

Intelligence =/= Game Knowledge

Same as if i ask you to name the 14th, 18th and 24th presidents and their place of birth. You not knowing does not mean you are stupid, it means you did not have that knowledge. Intelligence is much more akin to your ability to gain knowledge or to infer and discern things based upon your current knowledge.

If the Rammus knew that you build MR for Ap and Armor for AD, but chose to build as you stated then yes he is stupid. If the Rammus just was unaware that the MR he'd build or the AP damage was more important than trying to buy items to give himself attack damage (And thus use his passive) then perhaps he is lacking knowledge...or...oh shit...no, he is retarded. Lol

EDIT: also, wtf did you give them Azir, Anivia and blitz lol

More from Maps & Modes

More by Narasimha