Kindred's Role in Runeterra

A Superb Villain··6 votes·3,870 views

So there has been quite a bit of speculation about League's newest champion, and the most prominent assumption is that The Lamb and The Wolf are personifications of death in Runeterra. It seems fairly obvious that is what the duo are considering their activities and how frequently they reference dying in their speech. It is all so apparent we hardly need to investigate further.

I disagree, to an extent.

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/leagueoflegends/images/5/58/Kindred_concept_4.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20150915210006

When a world's population reaches a certain point, death becomes a constant rather than an occurrence; every moment someone is dying. To be capable of ending every life across the world at a moments notice requires no small amount of power bordering on near omnipresence, and the largest offender of this in Kindred's concept is the aspect of hunting. Hunting requires an investment from the hunter, to locate and eliminate their quarry, otherwise it is not hunting, it is execution. The Lamb and The Wolf are the Eternal Hunters, they track and kill those marked for death until eternity ends. They do not appear instantly, nor do they have a means of immediately dispatching their prey. Their procedure is a gradual, but inevitable one.

http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/leagueoflegends/images/5/5b/Kindred_concept_1.png/revision/latest?cb=20150915205814

As hunters, The Lamb and Wolf are proactive, they seek out their targets. If they were the aspect of death what need would there be to hunt at all? Death is inevitable, there is no fighting it. The end of a life is a question of when and how, not if. To hunt would also imply Kindred must take the initiative, they are active, not reactive, continually seeking those marked for death.

If Kindred is not Death, than what are they?

Answering this requires a look at another champion, one who exists beyond the boundaries of Runeterra. Bard, like Kindred, bears the responsibility of a monumental task, though less involved with death and more so with continuity; Bard ensures the universe continues turning. It is he who intervenes to prevent unnecessary harm, to end conflict before it gets out of hand, to ensure a single string of fate remains uncut. Bard is the Wandering Caretaker, an ever mobile protector of reality. Fascinating to note that while Bard frequently safeguards what has yet to play a part in life, there is no mention of ending one.

Convenient, isn't it, there exists two mystical beings to do the one thing Bard cannot. As a gardner tends the flowers, so too must someone pull the weeds, and it is exactly that role Kindred fulfills. They nip a problem in the bud, they take life so others may live, they deny catastrophe by killing the catalyst.

Kindred is not death, but their purpose is deeply intertwined with its presence.

15 Comments

Ralanr3 votes

Hmm...if Kindred was responsible for killing the Ruined King, then their role as fate's hitman would make more sense.

Anything that threatens the balance of the cosmos must be removed or eliminated.

Or maybe it's something else. What if Kindred is not natural, but a byproduct of whatever event that created the shadow isles?

Maybe they see themselves as death.

Valaran Nara2 votes

The Pale Man with Black hair is not death.

He just works as such. In other words, shinigami (soul reapers, grim reapers, etc) exist in the world of Runeterra. How many there are can be anybody's guess, but since they can't be everywhere, there has to be a group or agency that takes charge of regulating souls.

With this being said, because of the pale man's loneliness, the number of reapers isn't large enough for 2 crossing paths to be too common of an occurrence.

His job, his duty, his purpose as a being caused him to be shunned, forever alone. Kindred just happens to be the result of said reaper wishing to no longer be 1.

GreenLore2 votes

I think kindred is death,but they probably do work on a different level than some believe,they might have an actove amd a passive aspect of kindred.

For every death there is an active cause,be it murder,accident,a disease or just old age. Everyone who dies "encounters kindred",but thats more of a passive effect of them.They don't do this actively,it is simply a part of nature.

If kindred however decides that someone should die and the active part of the death doesn't happen,then they'll materialize and hunt that target until they manage to kill it,or get killed by them However that doesn't mean that neither the passive nor the active aspect of kindred is unbeatable.

Beating the passive aspect is probably only possible via magic and results in undeath(or maybe revival?),the active part can probably be beaten through pure fighting ability.

A Superb Villain1 votes

I feel that raises the question of how these distinctions are made; if death happens to everyone, why are a select few exempt, requiring Kindred's manifestation to apprehend them. Why would the phenomenon exist at all? What determines a natural death, or the intervention of Kindred? If it involves tampering with the natural order of life and death, then nearly every champion that is undead now would have been Marked while they were still alive, yet Kindred does not seem interested in any such champions at all.

GreenLore3 votes

Maybe I worded it wrong,but in essence I think that your interpretation isn't that different from mine. I think that if kindred wants someone dead,then they need to actively hunt and kill these persons(the question would be how they'd decide who will live and who will die,but thats a different question),but that kindred is really death itself too,that they exist on multiple planes at once. On a spiritual one they take the lives of those who die even if they weren't the cause of death.

But their marterial body is pretty much a hunter like you described it.

A Superb Villain1 votes

I can find no point in your argument to contend, but I cannot think of anything to add to it either, so I will just upvote it instead.

GreenLore1 votes

Thx,I also like your theory.

I mean after all,almost all the information that we get about kindred comes from the lamb and she seems to be very poetic,so it wouldn't be odd for her to overdramatize some things.

Ralanr2 votes

Perhaps it is only when that persons continued existence would disturb the balance?

We don't know how powerful fate is in League of Legends. The best understanding is Diana vs Leona, which leaves a lot of possibilities.

A Superb Villain1 votes

I would presume fate, the concept itself, is absolutely powerful, because if fate was fallible it would not be fate.

Ralanr2 votes

Sadly the closest thing we have to understanding fate and destiny in league is from Zilean. Because he sees the past, future, and present constantly.

I wonder if he sees it like Clockwork from Danny Phantom? Seeing the parade from above.

A Superb Villain1 votes

To counterbalance that he suffers from Chronodisplasia, which means he has no idea what time he presently inhabits, and its fluid nature prevents him from forming a concrete idea.

GreenLore1 votes

Actually I'd say Malzahar is a better example. Zilean tried to see into all the possible futures(meaning there are seemingly multiple ones),but it never says that he succeeded and his chrono displesia only shows him the past,not the future.

Malzahar however seems to see his visions as things that will definetly happen,no matter what.

Ebonmaw Dragon1 votes

[{quoted}](name=A Superb Villain,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=3pjp7A3X,comment-id=00030000,timestamp=2015-09-17T12:55:46.464+0000)

I feel that raises the question of how these distinctions are made; if death happens to everyone, why are a select few exempt, requiring Kindred's manifestation to apprehend them. Why would the phenomenon exist at all? What determines a natural death, or the intervention of Kindred? If it involves tampering with the natural order of life and death, then nearly every champion that is undead now would have been Marked while they were still alive, yet Kindred does not seem interested in any such champions at all.

I dont think that Kindred is the one who chooses who must die by their hands(... fangs... arrows). But they only hunt the ones "marked"... however, they are not the ones that put the "mark". Now here is an small theory: Kindred is a Celestial Being... and the Celestials follow the orders of the "Stars" according to the lore of Soraka, so, the ones that put the "mark" are the "Stars" not Kindred... why did they do that? I dont know, maybe that person must die to preserve the balance or something like that.

Karn Bishop1 votes

They are death themselves, however sometimes powerful beings defy the natural order and such individuals must be dealt with by hand. Sometimes they allow immortals like the ascended in order to deal with threats to the system of life and death such as the void or the watchers, but such immortality must still be paid for which is why amummu's curse exists and why Lamb sounds so sympathetic towards him and even sounds like she was going to explain before wolf interrupts.

Embertine1 votes

Actually if you listen in to their quotes, they reference both themselves being once one being, and cut in two, and also about the event that was the ruined king cutting through the veil between life and death. They also reference the weapon used to do it. I honestly believe that they aren't just death, but the veil between life and death as well, given physical form by the actions of the ruined king.

More from Story, Art, & Sound

More by A Superb Villain