Well, I'm not sure if Riot should...... I mean, I don't have 
tbh because I am too lazy to buy him even though he is super cheap. All in all, I made this as I felt that this was unfair to people who bought . Even if he is very cheap.
i kinda agree, it's quite unfair for those people who already bought Mundo. Giving players Mundo + a skin is like double the prize (imagine it as two mystery gifts champion/skin). Those people who already own Mundo will only be getting a skin. It's cool that we also get free champs when we get the Youtube/Facebook/Twitter skins, but this Mundo skin is different, we earned it together, we must get same prizes.
What's the difference between this and the Garen/Tristana/Alistar promotions? They give the champs + skin if you don't have them, and are easier to get.
Quit whining over 1350 IP.
If you don't own Mundo, you will get Mundo.
http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/riot-official/GVNZLJzn-team-up-pool-party?comment=0014
Link to Red.
If we got a different Pool Party skin for a champion we do own, that would be even better than the current offering - it's nice that Riot's giving out this free skin, but it's not much good to those of us who don't play Mundo and don't want to.
Do you think players who don't have Mundo should get the Pool Party Mundo skin from 66 million points?
No, I think they should get it from 55m points.
When I got Riot Kayle out of club activities, I didn't own Kayle.
They gave me Kayle.
Same logic applies. I don't exactly see why they wouldn't give you the inherently free-to-obtain champion for earning a skin for that champion, especially since they can't give you the skin you earned without the champion.
