Definitely Not Udyr?

GrubHooligan·3/15/2015, 1:01:24 PM·4 votes·2,247 views

First off, just as a disclaimer, the Definitely Not Udyr skin looks amazing. It might be my all-time favorite skin.

But it's definitely not Definitely Not Udyr. It's definitely Udyr. It's as Udyr as an Udyr could get. It's the exact opposite of a disguise. So the name seems wrong to me.

When I look at the skin, what it really makes me think of is Mundo Mundo. It's Udyr in an Udyr costume. Any chance we could get the skin name changed to "Udyr Udyr"? Or "Definitely Udyr"? Whatever the name, I'm 100% going to buy it, but I think Definitely Not Udyr is a misnomer.

4 Comments

Zahz3/15/2015, 1:17:24 PM1 votes

Its an april fools skin. Kinda designed not to make sense

OhOkYea3/15/2015, 1:31:50 PM1 votes

It's possibly the best skin in the game

Killstrado3/15/2015, 4:40:07 PM1 votes

I kinda thought that too, but hey who cares about names archlight Velkoz and the wardens Nautilus Sivir

MTaur3/18/2015, 2:23:35 AM1 votes

I agree with the OP. They totally screwed up the name. It should be called something else.

Lux with a top hat and a fake beard would be Definitely Not Lux. Rek'Sai with a wig, lipstick, purse, and a dress would be Definitely Not Rek'Sai. Annie on stilts with doilies, a grey wig, and grandma glass would be Definitely Not Annie.

But big plush mascots are inherently costumes rather than disguises, because no one ever tries to "pass" as a sports mascot. The mascot is a costume. If you're wearing that costume, then you are that mascot. A person wearing a mascot costume is a mascot. There is no real person they're trying to steal the identity of.