Does bigger champion pool theoretically mean more bans?

ìAm·9/26/2016, 11:01:55 AM·2 votes·558 views

How will 6 bans be enough when we have over 300-400 champions to choose from in the far future?

(The mind of a pot head is at work)

4 Comments

Dynikus9/26/2016, 11:05:43 AM1 votes

There will never be that many champions. League has been around for 7 years, and is at 133 including ivern. Realistically league won't last long enough for that. And they're already thinking about increasing the number of bans to 10 next season.

Ladrac9/26/2016, 11:10:06 AM1 votes

Rito release a new champion once 2 or 3 months I guess...so it will take some years till we re gonna have 300-400 champions xD Anyway, I think that 6 bans arent enough now, when we have 130+ champions...but if we re gonna have 10 bans we ll have to wait longer in champion select. There s a lot of players who wait till the last second to ban someone, which I find pretty annoying, especially if someone also dodges later xD Sincerely, I would prefer to have only 10 seconds to ban a champion and have 10 avaible bans in the future, or at least 8. Anyway, from what I see, the 6 bans are used almost everytime to ban: Darius Yasuo Vayne Zed+ 2 random that have high winrate in the actual patch or are just annoying to play against.