I'll be honest, I'd rather have a good player on my team that is toxic rather than a bad player that
is nice.
is nice.
Sweet. I disagree with you but my hand is literally dead from playing league and typing on the boards all day. Agree to disagree.
[deleted]
how is this the other person's thread? He was specifically talking about how Riot supposedly favors nicer players over toxic players (which is true, it's common sense).
He said "Seems like the other person's thread.." not it is another person's thread. He is stating that it sounds similar to the other.
we are all bad compared to the next skill tier above us. it is not their fault if they got placed in a game with stronger players. it could happen to anyone.
"Proud and Bronze"
XD
In 6 months of playing regularly, the bad player will be serviceable and the toxic player will be banned or will have worn out his welcome with me. So I'll take the bad player.
Everyone incoming to downvote u is silver and has 10 games in it but thinks they know what they are talking about when it comes to competitive gaming
Edit: point proven
I'm silver 3 and I've been playing for like 3 years, I'm not saying I'm good mostly because if I was I'd be able to get up there... But that's opinion so be it. I was silver 2 last season and I'm hoping to become better. The thread you made was askin' if people in league are preferring positive players over toxic skilled players (Or I think it was you). And so we gave our opinions.
lol keep in mind guys, the people the commented on this post have not given any arguments yet for why this is wrong.
you can't be wrong on an opinion but people can disagree with you
I know they can. It's the boards.
lol keep in mind guys, the people the commented on this post have not given any arguments yet for why this is wrong.
This is wrong because if it's gotten to the point where a player is tilted and toxic, there's no way they're going to still be putting their efforts into the game. In my experience, once people blow their lids, they become sloppy, demanding, and just so overall frothing at the mouth that they give up completely and just start yelling at people. As I keep telling people in my games, if you are talking, you are not playing. If you are typing, you are not pressing QWER1234 and you are standing still and missing kills, creep, and probably going to get yourself killed. That on principle is why someone who is already toxic and flaming is worse by far than someone actually trying to turn things around. Plus, their toxic behavior erodes away at the rest of the team's morale, and it causes other players to "defend their e-dignity" and retort with equal amounts of toxicity, to the point where your team is in-fighting and not playing. So no, toxic players are always bad because there's no way they can actually play the game and continue typing their toxic spew and continue to be "good players."
Well for one it is entirely subjective. So there is no right or wrong. But most people would probably agree. I would even agree.
It's a useless sentiment, though. It isn't a choice you ever make and the two aren't related. There are good people who are toxic, there are bad people who are nice. It isn't like the ones who are good and toxic are good because they are toxic.
im not sure why this gets disliked. i dont care about flame, if it really starts to annoy me i mute the person. so yea in the end for me its just "a good MUTED player vs a bad MUTED player" lol