The bias against unconventional picks is pretty blatant

TendajiX·6/24/2017, 5:16:45 AM·4 votes·464 views

I played a game with a friend and went Vladimir bot, with him Riven support VS Vayne Nami . We're doing perfectly fine, completely even in cs, and essentially no action bot whatsoever. Cassiopeia mid was already 0/4 lol. The enemy Ahri roamed bot and we both died when they dove us. This set us pretty behind, with me falling a kill and 20 cs behind off of this play. Me and Riven caught them at dragon and killed Vayne and Twitch (jungle) for free, so I managed to bridge the kill gap. Cass proceeds to die 2 more times, and after she gets dove again, me, Riven Nunu move in for the cleanup. Nami saves her and Ahri kills me in the getaway. This fed Ahri is ripping us to shreds with her 600 damage 7/0 q's, constantly roaming to put us even further behind. She roams again and kills Riven . I'm now 30 cs behind, but by the time we FF@20, I was still 2/2/3, Riven 3/4/0. Cassiopeia was 0/7/0. Once we hit the after-game lobby, ourEkko immediately blames me and Riven for the loss lmao. This weird mental disconnect struck me as so ignorant that I felt like the amount of bias in the community had to be addressed.

0 Comments