Banning ally's champion is unnecessary and should be prohibited

In draft or rank, we can ban ally's champion.

At first, I wanna say that is unnecessary. If the player is a troll, banning can't solve the problem. THE TROLL will pick another TROLL and be worse and jump with joy that he made the team nervous.

If the player is not a troll, we can see the game dodged or the banned player must be upset. That's so bad for your wining rate critically. If we fight each other before game, we already lose needless to say.

You can think your ally pick the champion that not suitable for his position, but even if it is so, banning will just drop your winning rate. That's unchangeable.

If he is not a troll, improper pick means he don't have wide range of champion pool, assigned second or unwanted position, is one champion master, or is practicing specific champion with several positions.

In all cases, banning hurt team play and just drop your winning rate.

For one example, you are ADC or SPT user and you can have your preferred SPT or ADC ally, or you can be more skilled and have more knowledge about champion counters.

For another example, there is a TOP user and he assigned SPT position but he can't do any spt champions.

That looks plausible but banning is still not good. If the player is NOT A TROLL, banning restrict his most card so far as circumstances permit, so his next choice will be worse than the first.

Above all things, I wanna say morale and unity are the most factors to win the game.

In fact, banning is not the antithese about the trolling and is trolling itself.

Welcome discussions and Ty