Computer Suddenly Shutdown is a Big Diff to AFK/Leave

chicken doodle··1 votes·841 views

My computer shut downed because it was "overheated" 0% available, plugged in, charging. BUT it isn't charging. Didn't you say if you are in a game in the majority of the game and came back in just a few minutes, you are immune to punishments? Well, explain this: My computer shut downed because it overheated, I came back ASAP, and we won. Why do I deserve a blind "punishment"? This is torment.

10 Comments

SmokedAlmonds4 votes

Someone's computer freezing 1 time is different than a rage quit(although the effects are identical). But punishments aren't handed out for individual leaves, but rather for leaving games at an unacceptable rate. There is built in leniency for occasional problems but if you are at the point of being punished you have used that up. Think of it like negligence.

It is a common misconception that leaverbuster only exists for rage quitters, but it is also to curb people with frequent connection/computer issues.

chicken doodle1 votes

Only, though, computer issues are rare. Very rare. It only happened 2 times this month.

SmokedAlmonds2 votes

{quoted}

Only, though, computer issues are rare. Very rare. It only happened 2 times this month.

Well whether or not 2 leaves in a month is rare depends on how many games you played. If you played 200 games in that month it would be low, if you played 20 it would be high. Leaverbuster seems to look at your entire history though.

What level of low priority queue are you at and how many total games have you left in the past?

chicken doodle1 votes

About 14 games in 2.5 years.

EvilDustMan3 votes

Yet, how would they be able to tell the difference?

chicken doodle1 votes
  1. My chat wasn't offensive, so any means of rage quit leaves here.
  2. My game was successful, so was my KDA, so any means of trolling leaves here.
  3. I reconnected within 5 minutes after "leaving".

Additionally, spending 20 or 15 minutes in "lower priority" is ridiculous, 10 minutes is more appropriate.

Hyrum Graff1 votes

{quoted}

  1. My chat wasn't offensive, so any means of rage quit leaves here.
  2. My game was successful, so was my KDA, so any means of trolling leaves here.
  3. I reconnected within 5 minutes after "leaving".

Additionally, spending 20 or 15 minutes in "lower priority" is ridiculous, 10 minutes is more appropriate.

I'm pretty sure it doesn't award 15-20 minutes lower priority queues until the 2nd or 3rd time you've received low priority queues.

chicken doodle1 votes

Yep, you're absolutely right. However, I'm not speaking for myself.

DrCyanide1 votes

You only get punished for AFKing if it happens repeatedly. If your computer frequently overheats while playing League, then it's a sign you should fix your computer's overheating issue before playing.

  1. People AFK intentionally for reasons other than what's happening in the game. Some that due AFK intentionally don't type out their frustrations.
  2. Win or loss doesn't matter, people AFK in winning games too.
  3. The game lasted 37:40, you were AFK from a little before the 24:00 mark to 31:41. 7:41 at least, probably 8 minutes or more spent AFK, or roughly 1/5th of the game. How much of the game can you expect to get away with not being present for without getting notified for or punished for?

On the technical side, there's no way to tell the difference between an AFK due to hardware failure or an AFK due to human desire. You just know that your program stopped working the way you intended.

Deep Terror Nami2 votes

It's different to you, but not everyone else.

More from Player Behavior

More by chicken doodle